Quote:
Originally Posted by Newman
I have not seen any pictures. However, I am always flabergasted by people who are not walking in someone elses shoes who think they know how that person should be dressing.
WHAT on earth do you think the kids look like that this girl goes to school with? Do you think that perhaps kids from New York might look different and even more wild then our normal run of the mill kids from the midwest? (I am talking about secular kids).
You bet they do! Do you think kids who are going to a school for perfoming arts aren't way out there for dress? You better believe it.
Now, do you think this young woman who is walking a fine line in an avenue most of us have never been called to; might just might dress a wee bit different than your average Apostolic girl in the south?
Good grief! Yes!!! Let's not butcher our kids.  |
I will not battle with you, cause I don't like to loose.
But the whole point is not that the girl was immodestly dressed, though most cons feel she was. It was that she was set up as a roll model and her occupation contradicts what the org bylaws uphold. Since I am not UPC, I don't have a dog in the fight, but I have heard the voice of the conservative side. Now whether you or me agree or disagree with the governmental structure of the UPC, for an official to set up something that is contrary to that structure is to me very unethical, and shows little integrity on the part of said official.
Threaded Mode
