Is Acts 2:38 Really Supported by History?

Tab Menu 1

		Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Is Acts 2:38 Really Supported by History?

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!

#15

12-28-2007, 07:36 PM

Barb

Registered Member

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 7,617

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Does it matter if history supports it?

What history?

Who's history?

Isn't the Bible enough?

That's what I have been saying...there has always been a remnant, whether I can prove it in a text book or document or not.

I am convinced of it...

Bookmarks

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Haney History	Raven	Fellowship Hall	122	01-05-2008 10:15 PM
History buffs...	OneAccord	Fellowship Hall	8	11-16-2007 03:53 PM
Monarchians in History	BobDylan	Deep Waters	102	09-12-2007 08:42 AM
Acts 2:38 in first several chapters of Acts	mfblume	Fellowship Hall	2	09-01-2007 10:25 AM
Rewriting History!	berkeley	Fellowship Hall	28	03-06-2007 01:26 AM

User Infomation

Latest Threads
Thought You Might Like This - by navygoat1998
Happy Birthday tstew - by Salome
COPD - by Cornelius
COPD - by skeet5413
The Remnant - by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 PM.