Quote:
Originally Posted by BroGary
Here is some interesting info I found:
No mechanism has been put forward that even begins to explain how something like the human eye could have been produced by time, chance, natural selection and mutation.
Darwin said: "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree."
In spite of this admission, Darwin clung to his theory when he should have rejected it because the formation of the eye by natural selection is just not plausible!
Darwin said, "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
After well over a hundred years of intense scientific research and investigation, we must conclude that no one has shown how the human eye could have come into existence by numerous, successive slight modifications.
By using Darwin's own criteria and viewing the other aspects of science that relate to evolution we can conclude that Darwin's theory has broken down.
Probability says 'no' to evolution
Evolutionists such as Sir Fred Hoyle concede this when they say "The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way (time and chance) is comparable with the chance that 'a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.'"
|
The eye issue. I had used the eye argument for a couple of years before I knew darwin had mentioned it and other Creationists became aware.
There are a few pairs of cranial nerves involved with vision. Most people think only of the optic nerves. It is impossible for the eye and complex vision functions to evolve in time for an animal to find and eat food before starving.
I don't care how loud they get, there is no eye soft tissue to find from way back to support their crackpot notions of eyespots evolving to vision systems. Fossils only leave bones.
Darwin in todays terms was stupid. Ignorant.
He started medical school and dropped out. I don't blame him. anesthesia hadn't been developed and procedures like amputations were extremely violent. Just simple knee work today is done under general because of the use of a tourniquet.
With generals, now we and even very young students can be taught human anatomy and physiology.
Now the point is, without surgery, no one could see how these systems worked on a live patient when they are asleep. Craniotomies can be done under local by deadoning the skin, of course burr holes and removing a bone. Then we can do stereotaxic surgery and learn about functionality of different parts of the brain.
The irreducible complexity of breaking vision into a brain, optic nerve and the eye, they were created by God and work together. No parts can be eliminated. And the sorcery behind evolution calls for mutations. ooops, vision system mutations cause blindness. Animals with blindness are eaten by predators. Bats are the exception. There is nothing close to a mammal that is similar to a bat. It even has intricate sonar. You have dead bats waiting for sonar to evolve.
Threaded Mode
