PAJC- THIEVES, LIARS, and HYPOCRITES

Liberal · #1 01-23-2011, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

What do you challenge as being untrue Prax?

Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser?

Baron1710 · #2 01-23-2011, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liberal

Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser?

Sounded like an opening statement to me.
Laying out the facts.

If the facts are not in dispute no proof is necessary.

Liberal · #3 01-23-2011, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Sounded like an opening statement to me.
Laying out the facts.

If the facts are not in dispute no proof is necessary.

So we're prepared here to convict someone on an accusation only if no one answers the accusation?

MrMasterMind · #4 01-23-2011, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liberal

So we're prepared here to convict someone on an accusation only if no one answers the accusation?

And what exactly is.... "the accusation"

Liberal · #5 01-23-2011, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrMasterMind

And what exactly is.... "the accusation"

Insinuation, connotation, inference of thieves, liars, and hypocrites....by someone.

Baron1710 · #6 01-23-2011, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liberal

So we're prepared here to convict someone on an accusation only if no one answers the accusation?

If you do not dispute the facts as being untrue then we have a summary judgment situation.

Liberal · #7 01-23-2011, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

If you do not dispute the facts as being untrue then we have a summary judgment situation.

If there's no evidence, there isn't much of a case.

Baron1710 · #8 01-23-2011, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liberal

If there's no evidence, there isn't much of a case.

Not true. If the facts are agreed upon in a civil case the judge can rule on the case based on the undisputed facts.

Liberal · #9 01-23-2011, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Not true. If the facts are agreed upon in a civil case the judge can rule on the case based on the undisputed facts.

Ok well, I don't agree. But I've never seen a case presented without evidence, or at least, something presented as evidence.

MrMasterMind · #10 01-23-2011, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

If you do not dispute the facts as being untrue then we have a summary judgment situation.

Kinda works the same in debate or discussion.

"I don't like what you said.

What in particular was wrong?

Oh I don't know, I just don't like what you said"