PAJC- THIEVES, LIARS, and HYPOCRITES

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by mizpeh

BTW, who are these "revisionists"?

J.L Hall, J.R. Ensey, N.A. Urshan was a huge one while still alive. Larry Booker, though he of course wasn't happy with the "slow pace" of the UPC.

DKB is too much of a circumspect political animal to come right out and say what he's thinking on every issue. He maintains the "revisionist" appearance, but a careful reading of his material (coupled with asking him some question right to his face) will actually reveal that he isn't providing any scholarly framework to prop up the old "NA Urshan" way of doing things.

[MrMasterMind]

Originally Posted by pelathais

J.L Hall, J.R. Ensey, N.A. Urshan was a huge one while still alive. Larry Booker, though he of course wasn't happy with the "slow pace" of the UPC.

DKB is too much of a circumspect political animal to come right out and say what he's thinking on every issue. He maintains the "revisionist" appearance, but a careful reading of his material (coupled with asking him some question right to his face) will actually reveal that he isn't providing any scholarly framework to prop up the old "NA Urshan" way of doing things.

Closer to home it is the viewpoint touted by Ron Wofford, and is the majority view on AMF.

They hold the merger should never have happened and that the PCI were lost heretics, and the ONLY purpose of the unity clause was to give them time to come around.

IF so that would make PAJC brethren thieves and liars. Only conclusion possible from Revisionist history.

However, as previously stated, I do not believe that to be the case, and even the PAJC three steppers involved in the merger, did not consider their PCI brethren to be lost.