Do You Believe In Women Preachers?

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by rdp

Strange, I conducted a SCRIPTURAL study of these passages [regarding braided hair] several years ago & could not find this FROM THE SCRIPTURES THEMSELVES. I've heard this argument ad nauseum but have NEVER ONCE seen any credible documentation on it. All of these arguments MUST be imported form outside of the biblical texts themselves...Hmmm??

The UPCI also teaches that it's a sin for women to cut their hair...do you also adhere to this Prax? Unfortunately for you...NO! You commit the "Argumentum ad Populum" fallacy here.

A greeting w/ a kiss is not tied to the creation model as the "women preacher's" issue is. "FOR Adam was FIRST formed, THEN Eve." You're equivocating again...but, anything to circumvent the Word of God...right Prax?

Why do you always do that? You have three technical argumentation fallacies and you keep throwing them around so awkwardly.

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Why do you always do that? You have three technical argumentation fallacies and you keep throwing them around so awkwardly.

Funny, there's at least 30 Formal Logical Fallacies....& the only people I know who deride them are those not studied in them. Go back to the books, then come see me.

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by rdp

Funny, there's at least 30 Formal Logical Fallacies....& the only people I know who deride them are those not studied in them. Go back to the books, then come see me.

I don't even have the time to respond to half of what you say.

There's also an entire book of biblical hermeneutics. I don't pick 3 key terms that I've learned and smother a post with them to prove I'm smart.

Try articulating, it works better.

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Socialite

I don't even have the time to respond to half of what you say.

There's also an entire book of biblical hermeneutics. I don't pick 3 key terms that I've learned and smother a post with them to prove I'm smart.

Try articulating, it works better.

Funny...this is like saying someone who robs banks shouldn't be cherged w/ "Robbery" repeatedly. Ughh, WHEN YOU COMMIT THE SAME FALLACIES AD NAUSEUM....YA' GET THE SAME CHARGE! BTW, there's plenty of "books" on hermeneutics!

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Why do you always do that? You have three technical argumentation fallacies and you keep throwing them around so awkwardly.

Besides the fact I did not commit that fallacy.