**preacher forums**

D. Wright · #1 03-17-2011, 07:02 PM

Bullwinkle your posts concern me.

They seem to solidify the discussion here.

Bullwinkle · #2 03-17-2011, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D. Wright

Bullwinkle your posts concern me.

They seem to solidify the discussion here.

Au contraire mine are among the most solid.

The accusation was that preachers were covering for adulterers (active and ongoing) - I've already made the offer (as have others) that upon the proffer of proof I will make sure that action is taken. I am convinced that the accuser is blowing smoke.

The other side of this is simple slander and doing the work of the one who really is "the accuser of the brethren."

Charnock · #3 03-17-2011, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

Au contraire mine are among the most solid.

The accusation was that preachers were covering for adulterers (active and ongoing) - I've already made the offer (as have others) that upon the proffer of proof I will make sure that action is taken. I am convinced that the accuser is blowing smoke.

The other side of this is simple slander and doing the work of the one who really is "the accuser of the brethren."

So, although you have no idea who, or what, I'm talking about you are willing to call me a devil?

Gee, you seem so trustworthy.

The truth is, even when proof is offered, you will cover for them.

BTW, it bears noting that I have never, not once, on this thread mentioned any specific forum or persons.

Now go untuck your undies, put the pacifier away, and go to sleep.

Bullwinkle · #4 03-17-2011, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock

So, although you have no idea who, or what, I'm talking about you are willing to call me a devil?

Gee, you seem so trustworthy.

The truth is, even when proof is offered, you will cover for them.

BTW, it bears noting that I have never, not once, on this thread mentioned any specific forum or persons.

Now go untuck your undies, put the pacifier away, and go to sleep.

You done did it again without even knowing who you are talking to.

There are three closed ministers forums for apostolics. One wouldn't let you join (caf), one if I remember right you were banned from so that leaves one.

stmatthew · #5 03-17-2011, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

You done did it again without even knowing who you are talking to.

There are three closed ministers forums for apostolics. One wouldn't let you join (caf), one if I remember right you were banned from so that leaves one.

Actually there are 4. CAF, APF, AMF, and Wordshare. There could be another UPCI one, but I am not sure it still exsists.

Bullwinkle · #6 03-17-2011, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmatthew

Actually there are 4. CAF, APF, AMF, and Wordshare. There could be another UPCI one, but I am not sure it still exsists.

Forgot about Wordshare - Charnock got banned from there too I think.

Charnock · #7 03-17-2011, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

Forgot about Wordshare - Charnock got banned from there too I think.

Dear Canadian Brother,

Your smear campaign is going smashingly. You humor me.

FTR, I have only ever been banned from one forum, Wordshare.

I asked to be removed from AMF. I have never applied to CAF, and one of the guys who is the focus of this thread never approved my application for membership at JP.

So, you are very horribly mistaken. Your information is wrong.

aegsm76 · #8 03-17-2011, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock

So, although you have no idea who, or what, I'm talking about you are willing to call me a devil?

Gee, you seem so trustworthy.

The truth is, even when proof is offered, you will cover for them.

BTW, it bears noting that I have never, not once, on this thread mentioned any specific forum or persons.

Now go untuck your undies, put the pacifier away, and go to sleep.

Charnock, I have no dog in this fight, but you are rapidly losing credibility with me.
You bring several accusations, now you are down to one. I guess you tossed out perverts and pretend preachers.
Then you avoid naming anyone, even via a PM, because "you will cover for them".
Also, anytime anyone resorts to personal insults, it is usually because they sense they are losing the argument.
This is my last post in this thread, because I see nothing profitable about continuing a discussion where an unproved accusation is being volleyed back and forth.

Bullwinkle · #9 03-17-2011, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aegsm76

Charnock, I have no dog in this fight, but you are rapidly losing credibility with me.
You bring several accusations, now you are down to one. I guess you tossed out perverts and pretend preachers.
Then you avoid naming anyone, even via a PM, because "you will cover for them".
Also, anytime anyone resorts to personal insults, it is usually because they sense they are losing the argument.
This is my last post in this thread, because I see nothing profitable about continuing a discussion where an unproved accusation is being volleyed back and forth.

I forgot about the pervert part.....

The pretend preachers..... guess that is up to one's definition of how often a person has to preach to be a preacher.