FOX News: Illegal to Kill Osama

[canam]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

He was killed, by American military forces, in the conduct of war-- or do you not believe America's "Global War on Terror", "or America's war against Al Quaeda to not be valid?

Ah ,ah , ah, we cant call it global war on terror ,no such thing, Barwreck said so , he ordered them to not use that phrase anymore ,same as illegals , its just a little dissagreement .Coadie what was the phrase they are supposed to use now??

[coadie]

Originally Posted by canam

Ah ,ah , ah, we cant call it global war on terror ,no such thing, Barwreck said so , he ordered them to not use that phrase anymore ,same as illegals , its just a little dissagreement .Coadie what was the phrase they are supposed to use now??

In my speech, although I did not use the word "terrorism," I referred to "man-caused" disasters

\
Napalitano is gender confused but in terms of PC speech, it is caused by males.

[canam]

Originally Posted by canam

Ah ,ah , ah, we cant call it global war on terror ,no such thing, Barwreck said so , he ordered them to not use that phrase anymore ,same as illegals , its just a little dissagreement .Coadie what was the phrase they are supposed to use now??

Its "Overseas Contingency Operation" now roflmbo,to everyone else except the non pc and OBL. He cant vouch for it being any better

[Pressing-On]

“Certainly it would be a violation of international law to shoot someone who is trying to surrender,” said John Bellinger III, who served as legal adviser to the National Security Council and the State Department during the George W. Bush administration.

“On the other hand, just because someone is unarmed doesn’t mean that they don’t pose a threat and that the use of force is inappropriate,” he said. “It’s essentially up to the judgment of the soldiers on the ground as to whether they feel they are facing an imminent threat and can use force.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...QsF_story.html