Quote:
Originally Posted by Sister Alvear
we cannot believe every document we read or every book we read however we can compare notes and come to personal conclusions...we all usually end up believing what we want to anyway...ha...that is our human nature...no point in fussing ...I personally believe the church of Acts baptized in JESUS NAME for that is the way I see scripture. I did not mean to start an argument here just wanted opinions...not only things about baptism do we find in early documents we find many other things that we know were influnced by the thought of pagan religions of that day...
we can take books and make all kinds of so called early church doctrines....the only inspired book howwever is the Bible and from that book and that book alone will we be judged...
|
the fact that matthew 28:19 is also in the bible, which shows why the early church in many areas even before trinitarianism rose was used as a method of baptism. all History is, is a reflection of what these people were taught.
Matthew 28:19 baptism is found in many places and text of different people in history so one cannot simple throw that to the curb
I mean we dont know who the author of hebrews is,but its in the bible.
The didache has been stated to be in the letter of the gentiles, parts have been found in the sriyac form in acts 15. Much of the bible we have today went through changes during the reformation.
Hybrid Mode
