Why does Oneness deny Son as creator?

Originally Posted by Iron_Bladder

Please prove this from the Bible, I'd see the terms Son / Logos as being fully interchangeable, so the logos is creator at John 1:2-3, but the Son is creator at Hebrews 1:2, Colossians 1:16-17. Therefore the Logos is the Son as this term refers to the same one person of God!

Son and logos cannot be interchangeable because the Son was begotten and, thus, had a beginning.

Originally Posted by Chan

Son and logos cannot be interchangeable because the Son was begotten and, thus, had a beginning.

Don't say this PROVE this from scripture!!!!!! That's the point of debating in a chat room, your opinions don't interest me, only your evidence and proof as you use scripture interests me.

Originally Posted by Iron_Bladder

Don't say this PROVE this from scripture!!!!!! That's the point of debating in a chat room, your opinions don't interest me, only your evidence and proof as you use scripture interests me.

You already know that the Son was begotten. You don't need me to remind you of passages such as John 3:16 that refer to God's "only begotten Son." You also know from John 1 that the logos existed in the beginning but it was only later that He became flesh and dwelt among us (was begotten). Thus, "Son" and "logos" are not interchangeable.