Crossdressing...Just how does a woman participate?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Narrow Is The Way

There is no such thing as a pair of womens britches (jeans, whatever). .

Why do you say that? Can you prove it? Is there such a thing as women's socks, underwear or shirts?

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Why do you say that? Can you prove it? Is there such a thing as women's socks, underwear or shirts?

He cannot prove it and no one can prove anything to him, because he has made himself believe Deut 22:5 is saying that only men wear PANTS, when he totally disregards the fact that CULTURE determined PANTS on men, not God (since God made man a robe in Genesis). He accepted the CULTURAL change from robes to pants for men, but think the same thing cannot happen for women, when culture clearly did say women wear pants, too. Had he lived in the day when robes changed over to pants for men, he would have bucked and said "NO, ROBES are for men." He begins from the standpoint of what is in fashion when he came into the world and sticks to that worldly fashion and somehow reasons God into it.

[*AQuietPlace*]

Originally Posted by mfblume

He cannot prove it and no one can prove anything to him, because he has made himself believe Deut 22:5 is saying that only men wear PANTS, when he totally disregards the fact that CULTURE determined PANTS on men, not God (since God made man a robe in Genesis). He accepted the CULTURAL change from robes to pants for men, but think the same thing cannot happen for women, when culture clearly did say women wear pants, too. Had he lived in the day when robes changed over to pants for men, he would have bucked and said "NO, ROBES are for men." He begins from the standpoint of what is in fashion when he came into the world and sticks to that worldly fashion and somehow reasons God into it.

Very nicely summed up.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by mfblume

He cannot prove it and no one can prove anything to him, because he has made himself believe Deut 22:5 is saying that only men wear PANTS, when he totally disregards the fact that CULTURE determined PANTS on men, not God (since God made man a robe in Genesis). He accepted the CULTURAL change from robes to pants for men, but think the same thing cannot happen for women, when culture clearly did say women wear pants, too. Had he lived in the day when robes changed over to pants for men, he would have bucked and said "NO, ROBES are for men." He begins from the standpoint of what is in fashion when he came into the world and sticks to that worldly fashion and somehow reasons God into it.