Crossdressing...Just how does a woman participate?

[Michael Phelps]

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

Well, I guess there were men robes and women robes. If I were to use that logic then I could assume the same thing for men and women pants. so which is it Luke? robes or battle garments? It could only be one or the other wouldn't you think?

For those men who say ALL pants are made for men, I would ask them to buy a pair of women's jeans at JC Penney and wear them.

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

For those men who say ALL pants are made for men, I would ask them to buy a pair of women's jeans at JC Penney and wear them.

good point

[Narrow Is The Way]

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

For those men who say ALL pants are made for men, I would ask them to buy a pair of women's jeans at JC Penney and wear them.

There is no such thing as a pair of women's britches. If they aren't for a man, then they are not for anybody. Just because I don't want to wear them does not mean that God intended for my wife to wear them. That is a mindless assertion. Most of the clothing that you find in stores today aren't for anybody to wear. They need to be thrown into a fire somewhere.

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by Narrow Is The Way

There is no such thing as a pair of women's britches. If they aren't for a man, then they are not for anybody. Just because I don't want to wear them does not mean that God intended for my wife to wear them. That is a mindless assertion. Most of the clothing that you find in stores today aren't for anybody to wear. They need to be thrown into a fire somewhere.

I don't agree with your view on pants, but I do respect your desire to lead a life that is set apart from the world. I don't think anyone will go to hell for not wearing pants.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Narrow Is The Way

There is no such thing as a pair of women's britches. If they aren't for a man, then they are not for anybody. Just because I don't want to wear them does not mean that God intended for my wife to wear them. That is a mindless assertion. Most of the clothing that you find in stores today aren't for anybody to wear. They need to be thrown into a fire somewhere.

NITW: You have yet to establish or prove from Scripture that "God" has anything whatsoever to do with your opinion, here. Why not go back to the Word?

You had boasted of your "prowess" in understanding 1 Timothy 2:9, however you then went on to demonstrate very little experience or competence in NT exegesis: http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...95#post1093695

You then fumbled your response to Mike Blume's explanation of Deuteronomy 22:5. Just how can you feel comfortable saying what "God intended" when you handle His Word so clumsily?

I don't mean to be insulting here; I'm just amazed at the way you get beat in a debate and then come back boasting that you have some sort of secret knowledge of what "God intended." Go back to the Word, Bro. Immerse yourself in the study of Scripture. There is a Spirit in these Words - that Spirit gives us life and not condemnation. John 6:63.

[Michael Phelps]

Originally Posted by Narrow Is The Way

There is no such thing as a pair of women's britches. If they aren't for a man, then they are not for anybody. Just because I don't want to wear them does not mean that God intended for my wife to wear them. That is a mindless assertion. Most of the clothing that you find in stores today aren't for anybody to wear. They need to be thrown into a fire somewhere.

I appreciate your insight, limited tho it may be. You WILL wear pants found in the men's section, but you'll throw away pants sold in the women's section because they "weren't made for anyone"?

I think you don't have a good response, my friend, and this is a feeble attemp to prop up the straw fence.

If pants are made for men, then it shouldn't matter which section of the store they are sold in, you should be able to wear them with pride.