I Can't Stand Romney.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I don't hate Romney. I am just disgusted by him and the GOP. The previous article I posted is spot on!

How absolutely, ridiculous AND stupid to vote for electability and not sound principle.

Good grief, Charlie Brown. Have we lost our ever loving minds!

I will support the GOP nominee, I am a realist, if we don't win we will get Obama. Santorum probably is closest to my values and principles, but he can't win, so what good is a vote for him??? I am voting my principles, the person that is closest to my principles, and will do a good job, getting elected, and leading the Congress in getting things done. Romney will now be demonized by the media, Obama, and many in his own party. Is he perfect, no, but he will do a good job.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by crakjak

I will support the GOP nominee, I am a realist, if we don't win we will get Obama. Santorum probably is closest to my values and principles, but he can't win, so what good is a vote for him??? I am voting my principles, the person that is closest to my principles, and will do a good job, getting elected, and leading the Congress in getting things done. Romney will now be demonized by the media, Obama, and many in his own party. Is he perfect, no, but he will do a good job.

We won't get anywhere with any nominee if we don't pick up more seats in the Senate. But, I'm with you, I align more with Santorum and he won't win.

I think that many Republicans like Obamacare, for the most part, and want Romney to win for that reason. Pam Bondi, Florida's AG, has been defending Romneycare. She stated she is for the mandates. So, there ya have it - what the push for Romney is really about. Voting for Romney = Obama.

I have a few more recruits for you to pick up for Romney. The number keeps growing. Better get to work.

I am also understanding that Trump will be endorsing Gingrich tomorrow. We shall see how that pans out.

[Pressing-On]

Love this article by Erik Erickson at Redstate. He's always good.

You'll be happy, crakjak. He will vote for Romney if he is the candidate.

The National Review’s Candidate Won’t Stop Digging

It is days like today that make me thankful I think they all suck. At least I’m thankful I’m in the firmly not Romney camp.

This morning Mitt Romney said he wasn’t concerned about the poor. The poor, after all, have food stamps and Medicaid. But don’t worry. If the safety net is broken, Patrician Mitt Romney will fix it so the poor can stay comfortably poor. After all, just look what he did in Massachusetts. The poor can now wait 44 days to get in to see a doctor. Excelsior!

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/0...-stop-digging/

[Pressing-On]

Coulter is has gone off the reservation.

Mark Levin’s rebuttal of Ann Coulter’s “Three Cheers for RomneyCare” article

http://www.therightscoop.com/mark-le...ycare-article/

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Love this article by Erik Erickson at Redstate. He's always good.

You'll be happy, crakjak. He will vote for Romney if he is the candidate.

The National Review’s Candidate Won’t Stop Digging

It is days like today that make me thankful I think they all suck. At least I’m thankful I’m in the firmly not Romney camp.

This morning Mitt Romney said he wasn’t concerned about the poor. The poor, after all, have food stamps and Medicaid. But don’t worry. If the safety net is broken, Patrician Mitt Romney will fix it so the poor can stay comfortably poor. After all, just look what he did in Massachusetts. The poor can now wait 44 days to get in to see a doctor. Excelsior!


http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/0...-stop-digging/

So you don't think we have a big enough safety net for the poor.

Romney was beat up all day for that remark. By people that want to look stupid, he never said nor meant what the mass media and the Newt crowd have lied about all day long. But hey, all is fair in war, love and politics, you know! Take a partial comment and say someone said they don't care about the poor. Romney gave over four million dollars the charity, so I guess he doesn't care.

At least he won't vote for Obama!!! That should be instructive for you, PO.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by crakjak

So you don't think we have a big enough safety net for the poor.

Romney was beat up all day for that remark. By people that want to look stupid, he never said nor meant what the mass media and the Newt crowd have lied about all day long. But hey, all is fair in war, love and politics, you know! Take a partial comment and say someone said they don't care about the poor. Romney gave over four million dollars the charity, so I guess he doesn't care.

The point is that the choice of wording was a fundamental lack of understanding about conservative ideology. Conservative economics is that our policies are going to help everybody, including the poor.

DeMint even addressed Romney on his comments instructing him to "backtrack and reframe". His comments make it look like he is all right with having Americans who are dependent on government-subsidized social programs.

So, your point on Gingrich lying all day long is lame. Toe Torry!

And really, if you say "not concerned" - bad choice. And if you say, there is a "safety net", it makes it look like you are not going to help the poor move out of that place in life. Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaketh. Romney = Obama

At least he won't vote for Obama!!! That should be instructive for you, PO.

Erik Erickson would have to make that commitment. He has the most popular and respected conservative blog. Fortunately, I do not have to make any commitment.

Character assassination is another form of voter fraud.

How is your recruiting going? 'Cause you know come hell or high water, I ain't votin' for him.

If he won, turned this economy around and we were popping champagne corks in the street, I still wouldn't vote for him. If he lied about Gingrich's ethic violations, that he was cleared on in order to win Florida, when he knew he was cleared, what will he do in the White House to get his way? Not doing it. Toe torry!

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The point is that the choice of wording was a fundamental lack of understanding about conservative ideology. Conservative economics is that our policies are going to help everybody, including the poor.

DeMint even addressed Romney on his comments instructing him to "backtrack and reframe". His comments make it look like he is all right with having Americans who are dependent on government-subsidized social programs.

So, your point on Gingrich lying all day long is lame. Toe Torry!

And really, if you say "not concerned" - bad choice. And if you say, there is a "safety net", it makes it look like you are not going to help the poor move out of that place in life. Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaketh. Romney = Obama


Erik Erickson would have to make that commitment. He has the most popular and respected conservative blog. Fortunately, I do not have to make any commitment.

Character assassination is another form of voter fraud.

How is your recruiting going? 'Cause you know come hell or high water, I ain't votin' for him.

If he won, turned this economy around and we were popping champagne corks in the street, I still wouldn't vote for him. If he lied about Gingrich's ethic violations, that he was cleared on in order to win Florida, when he knew he was cleared, what will he do in the White House to get his way? Not doing it. Toe torry!

I don't think I've turned a single vote. Think Mitt will fire me? No problem, looks like he may just about have it sewn up now, specially since "the Donald" has come out for him. LOL

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by crakjak

I don't think I've turned a single vote. Think Mitt will fire me? No problem, looks like he may just about have it sewn up now, specially since "the Donald" has come out for him. LOL

The GOP Establishment had it sewn up before the election started.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

We won't get anywhere with any nominee if we don't pick up more seats in the Senate. But, I'm with you, I align more with Santorum and he won't win.

I think that many Republicans like Obamacare, for the most part, and want Romney to win for that reason. Pam Bondi, Florida's AG, has been defending Romneycare. She stated she is for the mandates. So, there ya have it - what the push for Romney is really about. Voting for Romney = Obama.

I have a few more recruits for you to pick up for Romney. The number keeps growing. Better get to work.

I am also understanding that Trump will be endorsing Gingrich tomorrow. We shall see how that pans out.

Pam Bondi is a compassionate, moderate Conservative whom I have had the pleasure to meet on several occasions. I did a joint volunteer venture for her camp on one occasion and she struck me as real-- not phony.

The key to the GOP taking back the White House is to present a moderate candidate. I guess she and others are begining to see the writing on the wall.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Pam Bondi is a compassionate, moderate Conservative whom I have had the pleasure to meet on several occasions. I did a joint volunteer venture for her camp on one occasion and she struck me as real-- not phony.

The key to the GOP taking back the White House is to present a moderate candidate. I guess she and others are begining to see the writing on the wall.

It just shows why the GOP Establishment is wanting Romney. They want Romneycare and Obamacare. Ann Coulter is now supporting Romneycare. She has totally gone off the conservative reservation.