Commanded to Speak in Tongues?

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Ok, be honest; you participated in glossololia, and not xenoglossia, as is recorded.

LOL! This such a ridiculous argument. Can you imagine Paul saying - Act 19:2 "He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost."

Now WAIT, it ACTUALLY happened this way, "He said unto them, Have ye received glossololia or xenoglossia since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any glossololia or xenoglossia."

[bbyrd009]

Bingo, imo.

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

LOL! This such a ridiculous argument. Can you imagine Paul saying - Act 19:2 "He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost."

Now WAIT, it ACTUALLY happened this way, "He said unto them, Have ye received glossololia or xenoglossia since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any glossololia or xenoglossia."

Amen to that. Tongues is not the Holy Spirit.
We are clearly informed by Paul that tongues will cease, while the Holy Spirit will not. Your babbling is singing to satan, imo, and strictly a sideshow, and has no relation to the xenoglossia of Scripture.

Please witness the fruit of tongues today for me; dissension is all I find in it. It is strictly an arguing point among believers. Peace to you.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Bingo, imo.

Amen to that. Tongues is not the Holy Spirit.
We are clearly informed by Paul that tongues will cease, while the Holy Spirit will not. Your babbling is singing to satan, imo, and strictly a sideshow, and has no relation to the xenoglossia of Scripture.

Please witness the fruit of tongues today for me; dissension is all I find in it. It is strictly an arguing point among believers. Peace to you.

Evidence of having received.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Evidence of having received.

Lacking that in the text, it is you who have added this, onto the end of a beautiful Scripture that is not revealing tongues. Anyone who seeks may find here, and may the Spirit be your guide. Dissect the relevant verses on a Bible engine; you could spend 4 hours on a verse now. Or, witness the fruit

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Lacking that in the text, it is you who have added this, onto the end of a beautiful Scripture that is not revealing tongues. Anyone who seeks may find here, and may the Spirit be your guide. Dissect the relevant verses on a Bible engine; you could spend 4 hours on a verse now. Or, witness the fruit

There is more evidence in the Book of Acts supporting tongues than against it.

The fruit of the spirit bears out how we have allowed continual, effectual change in our relationship with God.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

There is more evidence in the Book of Acts supporting tongues than against it.

Right; that's why Apo/Pents feel compelled to add to Acts 2:38--and furnish "Timmy" posts like yours here, rather than just quote some relevant Scripture.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Right; that's why Apo/Pents feel compelled to add to Acts 2:38--and furnish "Timmy" posts like yours here, rather than just quote some relevant Scripture.

I assumed anyone posting on an "Apostolic" forum would know them. You don't? I posted my first scripture reference with my first response.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The fruit of the spirit bears out how we have allowed continual, effectual change in our relationship with God.

It seems an easy test for this is,
"Are your borders increasing?"
Another would be to have a glossololia session,
and then 2 trusted "interpretations."
We both know the results there tho, I bet.

But rather than pick that scab, again, this part of your post seems more worth pursuing; but I don't get the relation to tongues. And I would have said it the other way:
"If we allow continual, effectual change (of our minds) in relationship to Christ, the fruit of the spirit will bear this out." I sub Christ for God, as Christ is our way to God.