Interesting Logic Question:

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Lacey

That argument makes me feel pukey!

That little tiny baby has a body too and does not wish to be murdered!!

If that woman does not want a baby or if pregnancy is a big problem to her,
why doesn't she just go have herself fixed so she can never have the option to murder or not? I can agree wholeheartedly with that choice.

Or give the baby up for adoption. Millions of couples would love to adopt an unwanted child. My sister has three adopted children.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Or give the baby up for adoption. Millions of couples would love to adopt an unwanted child. My sister has three adopted children.

Those are all GREAT ideas that I support Deacon. However... notice something... everything is being stated in terms of what she should be forced to do. She should be denied an abortion and forced to give birth by the GOVERNMENT. She should want her child. She should put her child up for adoption if she doesn't want it.

Notice every position is another dimension of "control" of another. Dude... if a woman simply doesn't want to give birth... and doesn't want to discuss why... what do we do... do we force her to?

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Those are all GREAT ideas that I support Deacon. However... notice something... everything is being stated in terms of what she should be forced to do. She should be denied an abortion and forced to give birth by the GOVERNMENT. She should want her child. She should put her child up for adoption if she doesn't want it.

Notice every position is another dimension of "control" of another. Dude... if a woman simply doesn't want to give birth... and doesn't want to discuss why... what do we do... do we force her to?

The government isn't forcing her to give birth. Nature is. She will either give birth to a dead baby or a live one.