Disturbing hair story

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Newman

Hahaha! Are there really feminist in the church or is that an oxymoran? And by the way what of the wife whose husband wants her to cut her hair? Where exactly is she on your scale of submission?

Her FIRST love is to God and His divine order just because a man doesn't understand it does not change it. God set the symbol not the husband. His ignorance changes nothing. And that is the FACTS.

[ChTatum]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Her FIRST love is to God and His divine order just because a man doesn't understand it does not change it. God set the symbol not the husband. His ignorance changes nothing. And that is the FACTS.

"FACTS" do not need an apologist.



Interpretations do.

[Newman]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Her FIRST love is to God and His divine order just because a man doesn't understand it does not change it. God set the symbol not the husband. His ignorance changes nothing. And that is the FACTS.

Do you think God is more interested in the symbol or the act? What of David eating the shewbread?

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Newman

Do you think God is more interested in the symbol or the act? What of David eating the shewbread?

First the symbol is NEVER as important as the act AS LONG as the act does NOT violate the symbol. And David was king & priest. And he gave the bread to his men. AND they were MEN by the way.