|
Re: You give some people a 2nd chance and. . . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titus2woman
Parents have certain inalienable rights that do not include failing to provide medical care any more than they may fail to provide food and protection from harm. If they do there are agencies that can and will be granted temporary custody of the child and see to it that necessary treatment is done. However authorities must first be aware that there is a problem. If parents fail feed or protect their child and the child dies as a result there are penalties and so should there be here. Religion is no excuse to kill ones child either actively or passively. If it were, Andrea Yates should have been within her rights as a mother to drown her five children. Children are not chattel, they are tiny humans with rights.
|
This post is spot on! I agree 100%    
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"
Titus2woman on AFF
"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.
"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.
"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."
Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
|
Hybrid Mode
