Quote:
Originally Posted by KWSS1976
Thats great he was turned down, so whattttttt, have you even been watching the case and all the evidence, the Prosecution tried to use that against GZ and they still failed at it, specially when you get a Prosecution Detective witness up there that states he believes GZ was telling the truth..
|
Yes I have, but I work during the day and cannot watch the entire case, frame by frame, as everything unfolds.
Instead of getting frustrated, try addressing the ideas I have brought up.
This case, isn't about me.
This case is about a dead 17 year old and a neighborhood watch guy who was trained to follow, but not to confront.
I have brought up questions on this thread that will likely not be asked of the defendant-- but if they ever were to be asked during this trial, we'd get a better picture of the defendant and what happened that night.
Furthermore, I doubt he was trained to carry his weapon while performing his duties as neighborhood watch-- I know the national neighborhood watch association teaches against this.
Which is probably why he didn't seek to officially codify his standing as neighborhood watch through an established and reputable organization.
I don't think he had the intent of killing the first potential intruder he saw when he left his apartment to go to Target that Sunday night.
I do think he was aggressive beyond the scope of duty for a neighborhood watch and his actions should not be protected by our laws.
Threaded Mode
