Catholics ADMIT to illegally changing...

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by jfrog

this we now mean to consider, using the so-called APOSTLE’S CREED as a guiding thread. It may be useful to preface the discussion with a few facts about the origin and structure of THE CREED; these will at the same time throw some light on the legitimacy of the procedure. The basic form of our profession of faith took shape during the course of the second and third centuries in connection with the ceremony of baptism. So far as its place of origin is concerned, the text comes from the city of Rome; (Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, [1990], 2004), pp. 82-83.) (Uppercase mine)

Well at least he is confessing that the so called Apostle's creed is not really the Apostle's creed, but a fabrication of Rome, which makes one wonder if they fabricated the Apostle's creed, what else did they fabricated? How about also Matthew 28:19.

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Well at least he is confessing that the so called Apostle's creed is not really the Apostle's creed, but a fabrication of Rome, which makes one wonder if they fabricated the Apostle's creed, what else did they fabricated? How about also Matthew 28:19.

There's no evidence it's not original

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by jfrog

There's no evidence it's not original

There is plenty of evidence, the question is would you accept to examine the evidence or simply reject it without taking it into consideration?

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

There is plenty of evidence, the question is would you accept to examine the evidence or simply reject it without taking it into consideration?

There is no evidence except the lies wordsponge posted.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by jfrog

There is no evidence except the lies wordsponge posted.

You see, you have already rejected and dismissed the evidence without even looking at it.

You fit perfectly the saying
"Do not show me any evidence, I have already made up my mind"

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

You see, you have already rejected and dismissed the evidence without even looking at it.

You fit perfectly the saying
"Do not show me any evidence, I have already made up my mind"

Was it not I who spent my time delving through the interent so I could find the proper cardinal ratzinger quote in context so I could show the shoddiness and outright deceit being used in the so called evidence that was being posted on this forum.

So then, whose the one that puts the time and effort into knowing whether the evidence being presented is true? The evidence shows it's clearly me. Perhaps you shouldn't believe everything you read on he Internet flamingzword...

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by jfrog

Was it not I who spent my time delving through the interent so I could find the proper cardinal ratzinger quote in context so I could show the shoddiness and outright deceit being used in the so called evidence that was being posted on this forum.

So then, whose the one that puts the time and effort into knowing whether the evidence being presented is true? The evidence shows it's clearly me. Perhaps you shouldn't believe everything you read on he Internet flamingzword...

You look at a single piece of evidence and you throw away the whole case, fine lawyer you would make.

cases are not decided on one piece of wrong evidence, but on the preponderance of evidence.