Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Guys, I think that they are seeing that we are saying (regarding a dual nature concept).Is we are saying that Jesus had a human nature and a divine nature(that would make his divine nature distinct from the Fathers divine nature). That would make 2 dieties somehow. Then we blend it into one deity. (Father and Son are one)
That seems to be the concept we are portraying.
If we took the divine nature concept off the table(because its not biblical), then we can say Jesus was truly human and the other point of view could see things more clearly.
|
It would be more correct to say that we can make a distinction between the two natures of Jesus, divine and human, but that we cannot make a separation.
By way of example, this is how I have always understood it, from
II Cor 4:16 - "Though our outward man perish yet the inward man is renewed day by day."
Paul is making a distinction of body and spirit, but not a separation.
And, BTW, this example is not the same as the Nestorian view in which they term "son" dealing with the humanity and ignoring the deity.
You cannot separate the two, especially after reading
Isaiah 9:6.