Lee Stoneking Today!

[Reader]

I would say contact Gilmartin if you wish to know if it was true. Gilmartin did not budge on its veracity.

[n david]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Perhaps what ended the facebook posts was that it was not true?

Exactly. The accuser lied to begin with. I would say more about him, but I won't. Again, I wouldn't believe this guy's claims, no matter what "evidence" he showed some minister. "Evidence" can be manufactured. And someone who begins their accusations with a lie cannot be trusted to be honest about their alleged "evidence."

[Reader]

But the alleged evidence was supplied years and years ago, way before his Facebook postings that were ill advised.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Reader

But the alleged evidence was supplied years and years ago, way before his Facebook postings that were ill advised.

Doesn't mean they weren't manufactured then. If you read the FB posts, you know this guy's history. Not the guy I'd believe without some very damning, clear and convincing evidence. He doesn't have it. His initial false insinuations don't help matters.

[Reader]

It appears you know the accuser? I do not. I do not follow his posts.

The manner in which he responded to the Facebook posts left much to be desired.

[Praxeas]

The problem is once an accusation gets out there, there are a lot of people that will believe it just because they want to.

[Reader]

That is a good point, Prax

[houston]

BAHAHAHAHA!

Rather than deny being a homosexual, LS got his lawyers after Jim Yohe.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by houston

BAHAHAHAHA!

Rather than deny being a homosexual, LS got his lawyers after Jim Yohe.

Sure did I remember it well.

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

The problem is once an accusation gets out there, there are a lot of people that will believe it just because they want to.

Well true, but there are also alot that will never believe an accusation regardless of how much proof one has.