Deep Apostolic Teachers?

[seguidordejesus]

Originally Posted by Lafon

Sir, I do have in my possession, on an official document with the CLC letterhead, Dr Dan Segraves’ signature, bearing witness to the things I have written about this incident.

If you will carefully note, our Lord’s statement of Luke 17:2 explicitly states ”that he should offend one of these little ones.”

Perhaps you understand those words somewhat differently than I, and if so, then that is your right, however, as for me, I interpret it to mean that when one does something, whether by word or deed, that “offends” another, especially ”one of these little ones” (i.e., a “babe in Christ”), then the “offender” is also guilty of having committed an “offence” against the Lord, and will reap the "just" rewards of his deed.

To me, that is an extremely serious “offence,” for it mirrors, in a manner of speaking, the same “offence” which Job was guilty of having committed, to wit, by his own admission, he readily admitted:

”Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? Therefore HAVE I UTTERED THAT I UNDERSTOOD NOT; THINGS TOO WONDERFUL FOR ME, WHICH I KNEW NOT” (see Job 42:3, KJV).

Seeing that God allowed physical “chastisement” to befall Job (inferred) for his having stated things to others which he wasn’t knowledgeable about, is it not possible that He (might) do the same to Dr Dan Segraves for his having committed the SAME “offence”?

It is my prayer that He does not, rather that Segraves come to an understanding of the severity of that “offence” which he committed against me, and which I am reasonably confident that he has also committed against others as well.

Whether you concur with anything I have written here, well, I’ll let that be between you and God, for its not within the scope of my God given privileges to render judgment against you for your opinion of my statements about the matter.

Therefore I see no benefit to be gained by me doing, or saying things which might, in any manner whatsoever, be interpreted as ridiculing your understanding of this matter, as you seem to be so inclined to do because you find yourself in disagreement with my expressed views.

So Segraves wanted you to consult with this guy on one issue and you're still bitter about it? Wow. This is why people throw letters in the trash.

[Lafon]

Originally Posted by seguidordejesus

So Segraves wanted you to consult with this guy on one issue and you're still bitter about it? Wow. This is why people throw letters in the trash.

And ........ Where did I say that I was "bitter" about it? Surely that's an "assumption" on your part, and a very erroneous one at that. Lest you have an "edifying" comment, why do you even choose to give your misguided opinion of another's statements!

No, that's not a question, rather an opinion of your apparent lack of understanding of the point I have sought to make known about my one, and only, attempt to engage Segraves in a one-on-one discussion of what I truly believed to be an issue of extreme "spiritual" importance, and his (what I deemed to be) "offending" response.