Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Father?

[Michael The Disciple]

Originally Posted by Aquila

"Oneness" inherently describes a union between two distinct things. Don't confuse the term "oneness" with "singleness".

This is the main argument Trins use against the truth. It is absolute trite.

One YHWH means he is one single YHWH. How easily this is proved in Gods holy word. The Trin scholars have pretty much ruined modern Apostolics in many ways.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

This is the main argument Trins use against the truth. It is absolute trite.

One YHWH means he is one single YHWH. How easily this is proved in Gods holy word. The Trin scholars have pretty much ruined modern Apostolics in many ways.

But if you have a YHWH living in two distinct "modes" simultaneously (Modalism)... you have two YHWHs. One here... and one over there.

It's essentially the same problem that is found in Trinitarianism... except these aren't distinct eternal persons... they are emanating modes of existence. You still have "two" Gods. Only now... one became two or three... instead of always being two or three. It's the very same mathematical problem as Trinitarianism.

But... if the one and only YHWH were to choose to be in perfect spiritual union with a zygote from it's conception (incarnation) and partake in that man's very nature as that man partook in God's very nature... God would have become a man in Him... and He would have been a man who was also God from conception.