Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Father?

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Sean...did you see the proof that I posted about Passover and the Feast?

Yes bro. I did, I posted 2 of them as a "counter" to them and they were completely ignored by everyone.

Prax, I will let you guys all believe that there is no true untainted bibles(translations) on earth to read,(its a vain argument)

I could not follow a Bible that is full of holes. You guys have ruthlessly attacked the KJV instead of trying to find answers to it's so called "discrepancies".

I have a very close pastor friend that taught your belief of this subject at CLC college. He taught the word is NOT infallable, because MAN translated it.

I choose to listen to the Baptists and the 7th day adventists as they defend the KJV, while Apostolics go down that path of NO absolute true translations.

Our young people these days are saying that there is no TRUE Word of God and is was written by fallen, biased men.

Well, we in the ministry have done our job well in telling them there is NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH.

If I thought from day 1, that my Bible was incorrect, I would have never believed it.

Well, there is hope though...some folks believe the Enquirer. God can still save their types because they dont care about the authors' credibility or material.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Sean

Yes bro. I did, I posted 2 of them as a "counter" to them and they were completely ignored by everyone.

Please summarize the argument against the word Passover including the Feast of unleavened bread.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Sean

Y
I have a very close pastor friend that taught your belief of this subject at CLC college. He taught the word is NOT infallable, because MAN translated it.

You are confusing translation with the Word of God. You are equating one translation, the KJV, with the word of God instead of seeing the word of God as the Greek and Hebrew texts

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

You are confusing translation with the Word of God. You are equating one translation, the KJV, with the word of God instead of seeing the word of God as the Greek and Hebrew texts

Exactly. The Majority Text and Massoretic text are the deal. We said that but Sean chose not to see we did.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Exactly. The Majority Text and Massoretic text are the deal. We said that but Sean chose not to see we did.

The "majority text" has issues: http://solascriptura-tt.org/Bibliolo...ture-Cloud.htm

The Masoretic text has issues as well.

For those who recommend NOT using the KJV, I have a simple and sincere question: Where can I find THE WORDS OF GOD?

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Esaias

The "majority text" has issues: http://solascriptura-tt.org/Bibliolo...ture-Cloud.htm

The Masoretic text has issues as well.

For those who recommend NOT using the KJV, I have a simple and sincere question: Where can I find THE WORDS OF GOD?

That website seems to say the Received Text is not necessarily the "majority text"?

[Steve Epley]

As a boy I fell in love with the Bible only had the KJV you know it was not a great problem for me to comprehend. Yes I had to look up some words but if a simply Ky boy could read it I fail to see what the conflict is. God never expected us to learn ancient Hebrew or Greek.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

As a boy I fell in love with the Bible only had the KJV you know it was not a great problem for me to comprehend. Yes I had to look up some words but if a simply Ky boy could read it I fail to see what the conflict is. God never expected us to learn ancient Hebrew or Greek.

Just proved my point. You had to look up some words