For stating what she thinks you would do ...? R U Serious????
in the context that he already stated that he would not do what she thinks he would do.... lets add that part...without that part, it would not warrent any second glance. with that part, we have us an impass.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
in the context that he already stated that he would not do what she thinks he would do.... lets add that part...without that part, it would not warrent any second glance. with that part, we have us an impass.
People are still entitled to their opinion even after ... the other asserts otherwise .... She should not have to apologize for having an opinion on a hypothetical ....
People are still entitled to their opinion even after ... the other asserts otherwise .... She should not have to apologize for having an opinion on a hypothetical ....
Well then I'll keep stating that your beliefs are of a Baptist and Presbyterian theology. After all, I'm entitled.
People are still entitled to their opinion even after ... the other asserts otherwise .... She should not have to apologize for having an opinion on a hypothetical ....
Dan, you are right, she is entitled to her opinion even if that opinion causes her to call someone a liar. however, once that cat is out of the bag, lets go ahead and stand by the statement as is.
Last I checked though, calling someone a liar gets you in some amount of hot water with the sheriff and his crew. know what i mean?
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
Dan, you are right, she is entitled to her opinion even if that opinion causes her to call someone a liar. however, once that cat is out of the bag, lets go ahead and stand by the statement as is.
Last I checked though, calling someone a liar gets you in some amount of hot water with the sheriff and his crew. know what i mean?
Keeping an opinion about what you think someone would not equate to calling them a liar .... IT SMACKS OF BACKWOODS LOGIC.
Hybrid Mode
