Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #661  
Old 11-18-2014, 05:28 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
If "person" is defined as a self-conscious reality, yes, two "persons". However, only one divine person revealed in both. One is human, the other divine. Two distinct personalities that mutually indwell one another. Jesus said,
John 14:11
Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.
This is plain language. "I am IN the Father", and, "the Father in me". That is quite different from saying, "I am the Father, and, "the Father is me".

Do you believe we see two self-conscious realities relating to one anther when we behold both the Father and the Son?
So you believe in 2 persons
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #662  
Old 11-18-2014, 05:29 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
Agreed, but I would not look at the humanity of Christ and say that humanity is to be worshiped. In fact, Jesus forbade people even calling Him good saying there is none good but God. I reject the idea that Jesus was testing the man to see if he believed He was God in flesh. I would worship Him if I saw Him in flesh, but I would not whatsoever be worshiping the flesh. He'd see my heart and know that.
ok
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #663  
Old 11-18-2014, 05:30 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

See, I don't make this stuff up. We have people saying two persons
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #664  
Old 11-18-2014, 06:24 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
See, I don't make this stuff up. We have people saying two persons
Yes.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #665  
Old 11-19-2014, 12:31 AM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
So, you are saying that residing in God's being are two distinct personalities??? One divine... one human? Doesn't this create as much of a Schizophrenic God as Trinitarianism?
One does "residing in God" mean? Is the word "God" a synonym for "building"?
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #666  
Old 11-19-2014, 12:33 AM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
So, there is no "oneness" between a man and wife who are in union and are one flesh? No "oneness" between two distinct braches that have been grafted together? The very term "oneness" demands a union between two (or more) distinct realities.
Aquila you are using undefined terms as if we all use them the same

"Oneness" as it pertains to "Oneness Theology" has to do with the Oneness of God..not a Unity of God and someone else.

God is One (Person). One in Number.
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #667  
Old 11-19-2014, 12:35 AM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
If there isn't a distinction of person... language would demand that Jesus say,
So it's settled. Aquila is not Oneness. He is a Unitarian who sees two persons, one human and one God
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #668  
Old 11-19-2014, 12:36 AM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
If there isn't a distinction of person... language would demand that Jesus say,

"I, the Father, am one." ... not... "I AND my father ARE one."
Why can't there be a distinction of Manifestation? Why can't there be a distinction of Natures?

Why can't the same Person say "I" as a Man because He has a Human nature?
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #669  
Old 11-19-2014, 06:58 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
Back home again! lol



I believe the words are totally trustworthy, but when we add grammatical terms like first person singular speaking to second person singular, confusing the terms as indication of more than one person misses the mark, I think. The terms and their labels were never meant to dictate to us understanding of the Godhead.

Generally speaking, though, language really is based upon multiple human persons, and it just cannot perfectly apply outside of that limitation.

If God really is one person alone, and used our language to interact in his manifestations then you can see how that would pose confusion to us and start a polypersonal doctrine, right?
I don't want you to take this the wrong way. I want you to really think about what I'm saying before just dismissing it. I see an irrational fear of the word "person" among Oneness Apostolics. For example, one of the definitions from Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines "person" as being one's "personality" or "self". To me, it is clear that the man Jesus Christ has a distinct sense of "self". In Jesus human center of self-conscious reality that is indeed distinct from the Father. For all intents and purposes, He has a distinct personality from that of the Father. We see Him pray to the Father, speak of the Father with distinction, express love towards the Father, speak of the Father's love towards Him, speak of being sent by the Father, speak of going back to the Father, and speaks of the Father as being His "God". He describes Himself as being "in" the Father and the Father being "in" Him; this clearly expresses a mutual indwelling that speaks of a "oneness" or "union" of being. But Christ's "person" (self-conscious reality, "self", and/or personality) remains clearly distinct from that of the Father.

The only way Jesus could have established that He was indeed the same person as the Father would be to speak as the Father while expressing human limitation. Instead of saying, "The Father is greater than I.", Jesus could have said, "I am greater as the Father." Or, "I, the Father, am one." Or, "I came from being the Father, and return to being the Father." Or, "But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither me as the Son, but I know all things as the Father." Language would be instrumental in establishing that the person of Jesus was the same as the person of the Father.

Essentially, your arguments are that the distinction of person seen in the man Jesus Christ is only an illusion, a by product of Oneness. However, if Jesus were indeed the same person as the Father, He would express it, speaking as the Father Himself... albeit while also indicating personal limitations.

Now, I don't really have a fear of the word "person". I clearly see a distinct "human person" in the man Jesus Christ. Truth is truth. I'd rather be true to Scripture than an eisegetical angle of theology. Notice, I draw distinction between "human person" and "divine person". So, I contend that I too only see one "divine person" in the man Jesus Christ, the indwelling Father. Even in the "human person" of Jesus, I see the "divine person" of the Father made flesh, for the man Jesus Christ was fashioned in the express image of God's own person. So, between the Father and the Son... only one divine person is revealed.... YHVH.
Reply With Quote
  #670  
Old 11-19-2014, 06:59 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Fathe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
So you believe in 2 persons
I truly believe in the reality of the man, Jesus Christ... and His Father, God Almighty.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.