Lee Stoneking Addresses UN

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by Thinker

Art Wilson posted a picture of the chapel because many was asking to see what it looked like... No more news for almost a year because he never wanted to draw much attention to it, people kept asking him to post updates and he wouldn't because he wanted to clear that with all those that attended the service ... there was lots of talk about protecting peoples privacy to worship .. many were from other countries and religions, they were at the UN to work and represent their interests (its a place of business) both meetings are held during lunch time..

He even gave his selection to speak at the UN GA to Stoneking. Many was shocked when did that.. He's not what has been painted here and other places... He posted apologies on twitter.. He admitted it wasn't wise and clarified that point on each picture...

Im with WII on this --- that we can move on



.

I'm with you up to a point but:

I still can't understand what he could have been attempting by not originally being upfront about that picture not being of his service?

[Thinker]

Originally Posted by jfrog

I'm with you up to a point but:

I still can't understand what he could have been attempting by not originally being upfront about that picture not being of his service?

It was a over site he said he sees it was not wise
Why would he want to deceive when he had pictures of his august 2013 service????
he posted them in june 2014 on Instagram an there was no attack or even questions.

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by Thinker

It was a over site he said he sees it was not wise
Why would he want to deceive when he had pictures of his august 2013 service????
he posted them in june 2014 on Instagram an there was no attack or even questions.

When was the photo in question actually posted?

I looked back and it seems to have been in august 2013.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
According to you there were some actual photos of the august 2013 service posted in june 2014 (and possibly just a few weeks after the "fake" photo was posted judging from your previous psosts).

When was the fake picture finally discovered?

I looked back and it appears it was in 2015.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So it appears the timeline i've been looking for is:

August 2013 a misleading photo is posted of a service that wasn't Wilsons
Sept 2013 actual photos of Wilson's services are posted.
April (?) 2015 it was discovered the photo was a "fake"
Post dicovery of the "fake" photo there were explanations and apologizes given.

So far this narrative sounds good. It lines up with most of the details I'm getting, except:

--------------------------------------------------------------
According to Walks In Islam this photo was used in an anniversary video and captioned another place as a photo of his bible study at the UN.

Has there been any explanation as to why this photo came up in multiple other places after actual photos of the events were taken and why it's true origin still remained undisclosed?

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

I already backed up what I said. I pasted tweets, facebook posts, and a clipped picture from the church anniversary video that are posting a photo taken from a 2009 event and captioning that photo as a UN bible study in 2013 and have declared those posts of that picture with that caption as a lie. So you found some later truthful posts? Bully for you. The posts and pictures you found have nothing to do with the posts and pictures that I declare to be misleading.

BUT: I said they are both deceivers. Don't forget Art Wilson's cadaver-looking running buddy with the magical missing hair and imaginary Osama wife converts and don't leave him out of the discussion.

Art Wilson's "borrowed" photo was used from Aug, 2013 until Nov, 2014 and were on his church website under caption "UN building first bible study". These "borrowed" photos were exposed on April 25, 2015.

Unless you have something, anything, and you do not, that in writing between August, 2013 and April 25, 2015 implies or states that these photos are not Art Wilson's actual service, then I say they were being deliberately used to mislead.

Any correction after April 25, 2015 is just damage control. All liars do that when they get caught.

You unfortunately are just a bleating sheeple so other than pity I really don't have anything else to say to you.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by jfrog

When was the photo in question actually posted?

I looked back and it seems to have been in august 2013.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
According to you there were some actual photos of the august 2013 service posted in june 2014 (and possibly just a few weeks after the "fake" photo was posted judging from your previous psosts).

When was the fake picture finally discovered?

I looked back and it appears it was in 2015.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So it appears the timeline i've been looking for is:

August 2013 a misleading photo is posted of a service that wasn't Wilsons
Sept 2013 actual photos of Wilson's services are posted.
April (?) 2015 it was discovered the photo was a "fake"
Post dicovery of the "fake" photo there were explanations and apologizes given.

So far this narrative sounds good. It lines up with most of the details I'm getting, except:

--------------------------------------------------------------
According to Walks In Islam this photo was used in an anniversary video and captioned another place as a photo of his bible study at the UN.

Has there been any explanation as to why this photo came up in multiple other places after actual photos of the events were taken and why it's true origin still remained undisclosed?

Frog your timeline seems accurate except that the first record of a real picture of a real service was posted in June, 2014, almost a year after the borrowed picture of the first service was posted in August, 2013.

There were no real photos posted a "few weeks after" the original photo, unless "a few weeks" means 8-9 months.

Why it was used in November, 2014 in the church anniversary video seems to be a mistake possibly because the "borrowed" picture was left on the church website (lol until a few days ago) and it was probably picked off the website and added to the video simply because whoever made the video wasn't aware at the time the video was made that it was not a picture of a real service and was not related to the church.