End Time Army of Women Preachers Psalms 68:11

[Scott Pitta]

Comparing the Titus passage to the Timothy passage is comparing apples to apples. Same subject matter. Same author. Different results. Reviewing the Timothy passage in the broader Pauline corpus is proper exegesis.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

Comparing the Titus passage to the Timothy passage is comparing apples to apples. Same subject matter. Same author. Different results. Reviewing the Timothy passage in the broader Pauline corpus is proper exegesis.

You still don't end up with female leaders in the church. While you wax reminiscent of old Pentecost of days gone by, so, are you saying that everything that was done by early Pentecostalism was book, chapter, and verse? You can paint yourself into a corner pretty quick by leaving the Word to seek justification for your doctrine through some sort of nostalgia.

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

Comparing the Titus passage to the Timothy passage is comparing apples to apples. Same subject matter. Same author. Different results. Reviewing the Timothy passage in the broader Pauline corpus is proper exegesis.

*First, what you're calling "exegesis" is actually "hermeneutics." Exegesis-proper involves dissecting the natural flow of the text via syntactical considerations, context, tense-mood relationship, consistent usage of the same (i.e., tense-mood relationship) by the current author (specifically in the same book), diagramming or phrasing, etc.


*In hermeneutics-proper, the student always begins with "intentional passages" (i.e., passages intended to specifically address the topic under consideration). In this subject, one would begin by looking at passages such as I Timothy 2.11-3.15, I Corinthians 14.34-35, Eph., Acts (i.e., passages intended to intentionally address the current topic). From there the student seeks to integrate "incidental passages" that address the same topic in an incidental fashion (e.g., I Cor. 11) resulting in an overall integrated hermeneutic & subsequent theology with a rock-solid construct.


*To take an incidental passage & seek to use it to override intentional passages alerts me that the individual is engaging in poor scholarship. Respectfully, it is clear you need to conduct more research into hermeneutics-proper.


*Again, you're merely offering deflection & smoke-screens - while refusing to interact with the originally-inspired biblical data in any meaningful fashion.


*Carry on & God Bless anyway.

[thephnxman]

Originally Posted by scott pitta

comparing the titus passage to the timothy passage is comparing apples to apples. Same subject matter. Same author. Different results. Reviewing the timothy passage in the broader pauline corpus is proper exegesis.

Your compass is badly BROKEN

Apparently you don't know the diff between the Offices in the Ministry; the ministering of the
Church to the Church through the gifts of the Holy Spirit; or the ministry of the Church to the lost.

Different Brethren have spoken truth ntpo you on this thread, and you have chosen to stop your
ears and close your eyes: spewing words out of context with content.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by thephnxman

Your compass is badly BROKEN

Apparently you don't know the diff between the Offices in the Ministry; the ministering of the
Church to the Church through the gifts of the Holy Spirit; or the ministry of the Church to the lost.

Different Brethren have spoken truth ntpo you on this thread, and you have chosen to stop your
ears and close your eyes: spewing words out of context with content.

Amen, and amen