More on Skirts

[Evang.Benincasa]

The pendulum swings in religions. Sadly some people swing far right without a shred of Holy Ghost. Then when they swing far left they do it with the same carnality they had when they were far right.

Good God from Zion!

And I'm the legalist?

Give me a break!

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

The pendulum swings in religions. Sadly some people swing far right without a shred of Holy Ghost. Then when they swing far left they do it with the same carnality they had when they were far right.

Good God from Zion!

And I'm the legalist?

Give me a break!

I'm glad someone around here is qualified to judge.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

I'm glad someone around here is qualified to judge.

Bro, you already made the judgement long ago. I'm just in the amen corner.
The sad thing is that people like you who are abusers think everyone else is an abuser. But even sadder, they go to the far left and take their old religious self with them.

How many times you called me a legalist in this thread?

Just call you Plank Eye Joe.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Bro, you already made the judgement long ago. I'm just in the amen corner.
The sad thing is that people like you who are abusers think everyone else is an abuser. But even sadder, they go to the far left and take their old religious self with them.

How many times you called me a legalist in this thread?

Just call you Plank Eye Joe.

So, you don't believe in obeying the Law? It's a term for one who believes in keeping the Law, is it not?

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Aquila

So, you don't believe in obeying the Law? It's a term for one who believes in keeping the Law, is it not?

Aquila these guys preach against the law, yet here they are preaching for the Law, which is exactly what Deut 22:5 is. it is kind of schizophrenic isn't it?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Aquila these guys preach against the law, yet here they are preaching for the Law, which is exactly what Deut 22:5 is. it is kind of schizophrenic isn't it?

Either Deuteronomy 22:5 is obligatory, or it is not. If it is not, then there is no reason to oppose crossdressing of any kind.

So what do YOU believe? Regardless of whether or not pants are specifically men's apparel, do you believe Deuteronomy 22:5 is obligatory, meaning that women are not to wear that which pertains to a man, and men are not to wear a woman's garment?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Either Deuteronomy 22:5 is obligatory, or it is not. If it is not, then there is no reason to oppose crossdressing of any kind.

So what do YOU believe? Regardless of whether or not pants are specifically men's apparel, do you believe Deuteronomy 22:5 is obligatory, meaning that women are not to wear that which pertains to a man, and men are not to wear a woman's garment?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Either Deuteronomy 22:5 is obligatory, or it is not. If it is not, then there is no reason to oppose crossdressing of any kind.

So what do YOU believe? Regardless of whether or not pants are specifically men's apparel, do you believe Deuteronomy 22:5 is obligatory, meaning that women are not to wear that which pertains to a man, and men are not to wear a woman's garment?

Actually, the New Testament gives us enough to admonish against cross dressing:

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 King James Version (KJV)
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate (woman like), nor abusers of themselves with mankind (homosexuals),
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

The word "effeminate" means:

Effeminate
ef·fem·i·nate.
[əˈfemənət]
ADJECTIVE
(of a man) having or showing characteristics regarded as typical of a woman; unmanly.
synonyms: womanish · effete · foppish · unmanly · feminine · camp · campy · flaming

So, a man dressing like a lady in any manner would be effeminate.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Aquila these guys preach against the law, yet here they are preaching for the Law, which is exactly what Deut 22:5 is. it is kind of schizophrenic isn't it?

No more so than Jeremiah and by extension the Holy Ghost observe,
(2Pe 1:21 KJV) For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

When Jeremiah penned the words below, it was under the anointing of the Holy Ghost. Here is what God said through Jeremiah:

(Jer 31:31 KJV) Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
(Jer 31:32 KJV) Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
(Jer 31:33 KJV) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

Silly of people to assume:
(2Ti 3:16 KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:


At least it is silly to some...


Ignore what God said through the prophets.
Ignore what God said about ALL scripture being profitable for doctrine and instruction in righteousness.
Ignore what God said about writing the Law in the hearts of man.
Ignore:
(1Co 10:11 ESV) Now these things happened to them as an example, but they were written down for our instruction, on whom the end of the ages has come.
(1Co 10:12 ESV) Therefore let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall.


Beuna suerte

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Pliny

No more so than Jeremiah and by extension the Holy Ghost observe,
(2Pe 1:21 KJV) For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

When Jeremiah penned the words below, it was under the anointing of the Holy Ghost. Here is what God said through Jeremiah:

(Jer 31:31 KJV) Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
(Jer 31:32 KJV) Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
(Jer 31:33 KJV) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

Silly of people to assume:
(2Ti 3:16 KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:


At least it is silly to some...


Ignore what God said through the prophets.
Ignore what God said about ALL scripture being profitable for doctrine and instruction in righteousness.
Ignore what God said about writing the Law in the hearts of man.
Ignore:
(1Co 10:11 ESV) Now these things happened to them as an example, but they were written down for our instruction, on whom the end of the ages has come.
(1Co 10:12 ESV) Therefore let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall.


Beuna suerte

Did not Paul said that if you keep one part of the law then you must keep it all and Christ has become of no avail to you?

So are you under the law of Moses or under the law of liberty in Christ?

or you only need a tiny little bit of the law, but everything else is grace?