More on Skirts

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

No, seriously, I was just sharing my thoughts.

Too bad, your honesty score is a bit lacking of late.

Originally Posted by Aquila

So basically, you're saying that the conservative position you hold only stands if you interpret Scripture in a vacuum and reject all external archaeological, linguistic, cultural, and historical data that might point to the contrary.

I think you just posted something we can agree upon.

Then if you agreed with what I posted, then you agree that Biblical accuracy doesn't matter to you. You don't care about the Bible, about "linguistics" which we all offered you and you ignored. That this whole back and forth with you is an attempt to kill the supposed old conservative Aquila.

Aquila if you agreed on that, then you would seek an altar. You would stop blaming a movement for your own psychotic behavior in the past.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Too bad, your honesty score is a bit lacking of late.




Then if you agreed with what I posted, then you agree that Biblical accuracy doesn't matter to you. You don't care about the Bible, about "linguistics" which we all offered you and you ignored. That this whole back and forth with you is an attempt to kill the supposed old conservative Aquila.

Aquila if you agreed on that, then you would seek an altar. You would stop blaming a movement for your own psychotic behavior in the past.

Again, I didn't say any of that. However, you did imply that your position only stands when you interpret the Bible in a vacuum without the consideration of language, culture, and history. Sadly, that's not biblical accuracy. That's the narrow vacuum in which cults are born from novel private interpretations.

Hey, that reminds me...

Were the pants that you claim were commonly worn as casual attire by men in Judea made from hide, cotton, or stone washed denim?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Again, I didn't say any of that.

You said you agreed, then if you said you agreed, then you agreed with what was posted. Are you medicated by a family physician or do you self medicate?

Originally Posted by Aquila

However, you did imply that your position only stands when you interpret the Bible in a vacuum without the consideration of language, culture, and history.

No, the only thing I implied is that you are still the ecclesiastical mole you have always been. You don't care what the Bible actually says, but just care what you are currently doing in this phase of your religious journey.

Originally Posted by Aquila

Sadly, that's not biblical accuracy. That's the narrow vacuum in which cults are born from novel private interpretations.

You mean the one you morphed out of to the one you are currently in? Mr Wonderful, allow to me to tell you that you are still the same religious biped. But instead of long sleeves and a braided whip, you wear Birkenstocks with a cattle prod.

Originally Posted by Aquila

Were the pants you claim were commonly worn in Judea hide, cotton, or stone washed denim?

At least they weren't lace like yours.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

You said you agreed, then if you said you agreed, then you agreed with what was posted. Are you medicated by a family physician or do you self medicate?



No, the only thing I implied is that you are still the ecclesiastical mole you have always been. You don't care what the Bible actually says, but just care what you are currently doing in this phase of your religious journey.



You mean the one you morphed out of to the one you are currently in? Mr Wonderful, allow to me to tell you that you are still the same religious biped. But instead of long sleeves and a braided whip, you wear Birkenstocks with a cattle prod.



At least they weren't lace like yours.

Just more insults? Nice.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Just more insults? Nice.

Wow, you really need to study about cognitive dissonance.

Remember me the idiot? Remember you giving the excuse how we are just the boys mixing it up?