More on Skirts

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

I don't know about that,the Apostolic faith is much bigger than a single issue, I am quite sure they will eventually quietly drop this pant issue. We no longer hear much about women wearing the red color are harlots or some other petty pet peeves of some old time preachers.

people change with time and old misconceptions fall by the wayside, especially with the new generation of preachers.

Here we go with misrepresentation of the discussion. I had originally discussed the language of the verse. I used the Greek Old Testament the 3rd century B.C. (the Old Testament used by Jesus and the Apostles), the Latin Vulgate 382 A.D., and the Masoretic text 1524 A.D.. I also repeatedly offered Revelation 19:16 to show that on Jesus' vesture and thigh meaning pants were written. Not that Jesus was tattooed. I pointed out that the Lexicographers where undecided on the Aramaic concerning the word for trousers in Daniel. Yet, did I or Pliny, or Esaias say anything about the color red? No. FZ, don't do that. Especially since you believe, teach, and have a book which attempts to prove that the Gospel of Matthew was a translation of an original Hebrew copy. While you yourself bring up a plethora of circumstantial evidence to present your case. Shame, my friend and brother. To excuse me of believing in such stupid garbage as teaching against shade of color. Still love you and respect you. No wide grin green emoji here.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Red? She best not do that in front of a bull.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Here we go with misrepresentation of the discussion. I had originally discussed the language of the verse. I used the Greek Old Testament the 3rd century B.C. (the Old Testament used by Jesus and the Apostles), the Latin Vulgate 382 A.D., and the Masoretic text 1524 A.D.. I also repeatedly offered Revelation 19:16 to show that on Jesus' vesture and thigh meaning pants were written. Not that Jesus was tattooed. I pointed out that the Lexicographers where undecided on the Aramaic concerning the word for trousers in Daniel. Yet, did I or Pliny, or Esaias say anything about the color red? No. FZ, don't do that. Especially since you believe, teach, and have a book which attempts to prove that the Gospel of Matthew was a translation of an original Hebrew copy. While you yourself bring up a plethora of circumstantial evidence to present your case. Shame, my friend and brother. To excuse me of believing in such stupid garbage as teaching against shade of color. Still love you and respect you. No wide grin green emoji here.

Come on Benincasa,

You are part of a small minority of anti-pants preachers, which is shrinking every year. Many preachers have stopped preaching the anti-pants on women doctrine, they may still officially adhered to it, but in practice they have already quietly acquiescence to the changing times.

I have hope that eventually you too will one day realize the error of your wrong interpretation of Deut 22:5 and will silently without much of a ruckus will drop the anti-pants on woman rants.