More on Skirts

[Aquila]

Guys, you're watering down the seriousness of an abomination. Do you tolerate a gay couple in a sexual relationship until you deem they are spiritually mature?

Do you tolerate a pedophile until they are what you deem to be spiritually mature?

Do you tolerate a Polyamorous couple living in orgiastic copulation until you think they are spiritually mature?

Where I come from, an abomination isn't something you tolerate until someone grows out of it. You lovingly warn them of how God detests the thing they are doing. They are in imminent danger of provoking God. The only proper response from one who desires to be saved must be repentance. If you tolerate an abomination, if you soft peddle the issue, you partake in that abomination.

You guys insist on a woman wearing pants being an abomination, but apparently that doesn't mean much to you. You handle the issue as though it is simply a modesty issue.

Like I said before, their are clubs and an entire subculture of abominable perversion and debauchery in like kind to that practice seen among the Canaanites. That is what Deuteronomy 22:5 is addressing.

But hey, if you insist on applying the verse to pants, it really doesn't matter, because ultimately you'll only address a woman wearing pants as we do, as a modesty issue that one will indeed mature into.

We both land in the same place.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Guys, you're watering down the seriousness of an abomination. Do you tolerate a gay couple in a sexual relationship until you deem they are spiritually mature?

So, you lost the argument.

Where is the list? I gave you a list of verses and asked you a question.
Yet, I don't see any answers to what I asked you.

Originally Posted by Aquila

Do you tolerate a pedophile until they are what you deem to be spiritually mature?

No, I would call the police on you. Yet, topic wasn't in my list of verses.

Originally Posted by Aquila

Do you tolerate a Polyamorous couple living in orgiastic copulation until you think they are spiritually mature?

You must preach to a bunch of saved people. Anyway, you aren't even being honest at this point. Because you are just trying to figure out a way to win an argument. I haven't a clue as to what you believe you are doing at your "house church" but you must skin them before you let them in. I catch them first, and let God skin them of their abominations. Are you currently involved in a few yourself?

Originally Posted by Aquila

Where I come from, an abomination isn't something you tolerate until someone grows out of it. You lovingly warn them of how God detests the thing they are doing.

Yep, you lost the argument, and now are resorting to contradicting yourself. Or else you just haven't the foggiest idea what a not tolerating something means. Lovingly tell a pedophile to stop molesting children? No, you have him arrested. Someone has multiple partners, they need salvation, and that is where preaching comes in. They don't get it, they don't want it. They leave. Oh, I forgot, you live in a better part of town. Not where we live in the ghetto.

Originally Posted by Aquila

They are in imminent danger of provoking God. The only proper response from one who desires to be saved must be repentance. If you tolerate an abomination, if you soft peddle the issue, you partake in that abomination.

Aquila? Whip n chair ministry? So, how's the shunning the guy or gal with the proud look going? Again, you aren't being honest at this point of the discussion. Because you haven't tossed anyone out the church doors if they haven't obeyed. But this is getting interesting. So, please I'm eager to learn. How many times does a person think devious thoughts before you throw them out the door? Hello?

Originally Posted by Aquila

You guys insist on a woman wearing pants being an abomination, but apparently that doesn't mean much to you. You handle the issue as though it is simply a modesty issue.

I handle it like any other on the LIST I gave YOU.

How about jelling it out champ?

Originally Posted by Aquila

Like I said before, their are clubs and an entire subculture of abominable perversion and debauchery in like kind to that practice seen among the Canaanites. That is what Deuteronomy 22:5 is addressing.

Oh, this is good. Where is the word CANAANITES in the verse?

Originally Posted by Aquila

But hey, if you insist on applying the verse to pants, it really doesn't matter, because ultimately you'll only address a woman wearing pants as we do, as a modesty issue that one will indeed mature into.

We both land in the same place.

Sadly, "we" both don't land in the same place.

You're a mess.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

So, you lost the argument.

How did I lose the argument when at the end of the day it is you who treats what you believe to be an "abomination" as merely a modesty issue as we do???

After all the wrangling over the Greek, the Hebrew, the culture, the customs, etc... your approach is no different than ours. Applied theology is where the war is won.