Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

He posts that we shouldn't take our queues from culture, and then posts what about wearing a kilt?

Chris, you need help.

There is a difference between taking examples from a given culture to define a text and then applying those examples to one's practice... and taking principles from scripture and simply applying those in a given culture.

It's simple. The gender bending perversion of cross dressing shouldn't be found among God's people.

Do you apply the same logic to high heeled shoes and hosiery as you apply to trousers? Because if you did apply the interpretation consistently, you'd have to say that both high heels and hosiery are an abomination on a woman. Because both were originally designed by men for men, and worn throughout popular culture by men when they were created.

But, with my concept, we have no issues. It's common sense. Today, heels and hosiery are a woman's attire, even if they were originally designed for and worn by men.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

There is a difference between taking examples from a given culture to define a text and then applying those examples to one's practice... and taking principles from scripture and simply applying those in a given culture.

The text is written in such a way as to make no doubt what they are saying. Hence the reason that men wear pants and women do not.

Originally Posted by Aquila

It's simple. The gender bending perversion of cross dressing shouldn't be found among God's people.

How dangerous religion truly is. That someone can shapeshift so rapidly in and out of the religious beliefs in order to walk among the sheep.

[QUOTE=Aquila;1537555]
Do you apply the same logic to high heeled shoes and hosiery as you apply to trousers?

What is a high heel, and why is there hosiery?

Originally Posted by Aquila

Because if you did apply the interpretation consistently,

How ironic, one minute you are having intrusive thoughts which are akin to a car alarm going off? Then in another minute you are talking about taking pictures of tacos? Consistency Chris?

Go find a church and a pastor.

Originally Posted by Aquila

you'd have to say that both high heels and hosiery are an abomination on a woman. Because both were originally designed by men for men, and worn throughout popular culture by men when they were created.

No they weren't. Again, you can find what you want on the internet to prove your side, and I can prove my side. Chris, all you want to do is bring doubt to the weak, sick, and discouraged. The hair thread has varying views by different Apostolics. You know what is the difference? They are looking to kill the young.

Originally Posted by Aquila

But, with my concept, we have no issues. It's common sense. Today, heels and hosiery are a woman's attire, even if they were originally designed for and worn by men.

There you folks, that is what this is all about.

[Aquila]

[QUOTE=Evang.Benincasa;1537559]The text is written in such a way as to make no doubt what they are saying. Hence the reason that men wear pants and women do not.



How dangerous religion truly is. That someone can shapeshift so rapidly in and out of the religious beliefs in order to walk among the sheep.

Originally Posted by Aquila

Do you apply the same logic to high heeled shoes and hosiery as you apply to trousers?

What is a high heel, and why is there hosiery?



How ironic, one minute you are having intrusive thoughts which are akin to a car alarm going off? Then in another minute you are talking about taking pictures of tacos? Consistency Chris?

Go find a church and a pastor.



No they weren't. Again, you can find what you want on the internet to prove your side, and I can prove my side. Chris, all you want to do is bring doubt to the weak, sick, and discouraged. The hair thread has varying views by different Apostolics. You know what is the difference? They are looking to kill the young.




There you folks, that is what this is all about.

The wise can see what offers common sense and balance, and what is purely rigid extremism. Allow them to examine the issue.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

The wise can see what offers common sense and balance, and what is purely rigid extremism. Allow them to examine the issue.

While thinking yourself wise you become as a fool.

Chris, you are just bad logic which goes in the opposite direction. Yet, you have already told the forum that you have issues far greater than a bit of cloth. Go find an Apostolic Church, Church family, and Pastor.