Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[Costeon]

This may have been already covered, but when we search the New Testament itself we find references to tunics, some sort of belt, cloaks, and sandals. Tunics were long shirt-like garments. It does not appear that pants are mentioned in the NT. I don't think turbans or other headwear are mentioned either, but turbans are mentioned in the OT. I had originally asked if Jesus and the other men of his day wore anything that visibly distinguished them from Jewish women. There has been a great deal of talk on underwear, but that, unlike in our day, was not visible.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Costeon

This may have been already covered, but when we search the New Testament itself we find references to tunics, some sort of belt, cloaks, and sandals. Tunics were long shirt-like garments. It does not appear that pants are mentioned in the NT. I don't think turbans or other headwear are mentioned either, but turbans are mentioned in the OT. I had originally asked if Jesus and the other men of his day wore anything that visibly distinguished them from Jewish women. There has been a great deal of talk on underwear, but that, unlike in our day, was not visible.

When did they have a completed set of New testament documents?

So for the lionshare of the New Testament being hammered out they were teaching and instructing out of the Old.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

When did they have a completed set of New testament documents?

So for the lionshare of the New Testament being hammered out they were teaching and instructing out of the Old.

Man, tell'em again! Because technically the Gospels are the end of the Old Testament. The Book of Acts is the first book of the New Testament, the rest are letters to churches, and people, and the book of Revelations. The Apostles lived the New Testament they know nothing about it. They went straight off the Old Testament.

That proves the importance of both, I don't know which reformer came up with that philosophy of thats the Old Testament we follow the new, but he was sorely wrong. Im not telling you to fall the dietary law, or the ceremonial law, but the moral law absolutely!

ATTENTION:!!GODS NOT SOME SENILE OLD MAN THAT WENT LIBERAL IN HIS OLD AGE. HE'S THE SAME, YESTERDAY, TODAY AND FOREVER!

[Costeon]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Man, tell'em again! Because technically the Gospels are the end of the Old Testament. The Book of Acts is the first book of the New Testament, the rest are letters to churches, and people, and the book of Revelations. The Apostles lived the New Testament they know nothing about it. They went straight off the Old Testament.

That proves the importance of both, I don't know which reformer came up with that philosophy of thats the Old Testament we follow the new, but he was sorely wrong. Im not telling you to fall the dietary law, or the ceremonial law, but the moral law absolutely!

ATTENTION:!!GODS NOT SOME SENILE OLD MAN THAT WENT LIBERAL IN HIS OLD AGE. HE'S THE SAME, YESTERDAY, TODAY AND FOREVER!

guys, you can just get a concordance and search the Gospels for verses about clothes. You'll find tunics, cloaks, sandals, etcs. Their underwear is not mentioned I don't believe, but again, in the OT it was described as boxer shorts. Again I'm talking about visible clothing. They did not wear trousers like ours. Then go read a Bible dictionary or encyclopedia. All this is covered. You will not find trousers mentioned as something Jews, Greeks, or Romans wore.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Costeon

guys, you can just get a concordance and search the Gospels for verses about clothes. You'll find tunics, cloaks, sandals, etcs. Their underwear is not mentioned I don't believe, but again, in the OT it was described as boxer shorts. Again I'm talking about visible clothing. They did not wear trousers like ours. Then go read a Bible dictionary or encyclopedia. All this is covered. You will not find trousers mentioned as something Jews, Greeks, or Romans wore.

Umm Sister Amanah posted this and please answer this. And breeches are more then undergarments..

Ancient Pants

The wearing of pants in Western culture probably arose with the equestrian warrior cultures of Asia minor. The Sythians of the area encompassed by today's Ukraine, Bulgaria, and Romania wore loose pants tucked into boots. A portrait of a warrior wearing pants appears on a cup found in a burial site from 770 BC.

The Greek historian Herodotus mentions the Sythians waring pants. Herodotus also mentions that the Amazons (female warriors of Greek mythology) as clad in trousers. An Amazon depicted on a vessel in 470 BC is obviously wearing pants.

Pants were adapted from the Sythians by the Persians (of modern Iran) by the 5th century BC.

The Celts, a nomadic people of Central Europe, wore pants, though documentation is sketchy at best. The style, copied from Sythians and Persians, spread through Central Europe around the third century BC.

Ancient Greeks and Romans equated the wearing of trousers with savagery and referred to those early trouser clad people as barbarians. When the Romans conquered Celtic Briton in the first century AD, they called the Irish "wild people." But as cultures mixed, Roman soldiers took to wearing a form of pants called braccae that resembled a pair of tight Capris, and were much more appropriate for cold weather climates than togas.

Braccae is the Latin root of the word breeches, a type of knee length trouser. Braccae, however, had adjustable hems and could be worn knee length or ankle length.

The Thorsberg Trousers pictured on the right are a relic from the 4th century AC and were found in Denmark.

Damendorf Man, a bog body found in 1900, perished between 140 - 380 AD. A pair of neatly folded pants was found near the corpse.

https://bellatory.com/fashion-indust...estern-Culture

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Umm Sister Amanah posted this and please answer this. And breeches are more then undergarments..

Ancient Pants

The wearing of pants in Western culture probably arose with the equestrian warrior cultures of Asia minor. The Sythians of the area encompassed by today's Ukraine, Bulgaria, and Romania wore loose pants tucked into boots. A portrait of a warrior wearing pants appears on a cup found in a burial site from 770 BC.

The Greek historian Herodotus mentions the Sythians waring pants. Herodotus also mentions that the Amazons (female warriors of Greek mythology) as clad in trousers. An Amazon depicted on a vessel in 470 BC is obviously wearing pants.

Pants were adapted from the Sythians by the Persians (of modern Iran) by the 5th century BC.

The Celts, a nomadic people of Central Europe, wore pants, though documentation is sketchy at best. The style, copied from Sythians and Persians, spread through Central Europe around the third century BC.

Ancient Greeks and Romans equated the wearing of trousers with savagery and referred to those early trouser clad people as barbarians. When the Romans conquered Celtic Briton in the first century AD, they called the Irish "wild people." But as cultures mixed, Roman soldiers took to wearing a form of pants called braccae that resembled a pair of tight Capris, and were much more appropriate for cold weather climates than togas.

Braccae is the Latin root of the word breeches, a type of knee length trouser. Braccae, however, had adjustable hems and could be worn knee length or ankle length.

The Thorsberg Trousers pictured on the right are a relic from the 4th century AC and were found in Denmark.

Damendorf Man, a bog body found in 1900, perished between 140 - 380 AD. A pair of neatly folded pants was found near the corpse.

https://bellatory.com/fashion-indust...estern-Culture

Certainly equestrian warriors wore trousers. Also, various royal officials wore trousers. However, were trousers the common attire of the average Judean farmer, peasant, or fisherman? I propose that while some men wore trousers, the trousers were utilitarian, not common wear in that culture or climate.

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Certainly equestrian warriors wore trousers. Also, various royal officials wore trousers. However, were trousers the common attire of the average Judean farmer, peasant, or fisherman? I propose that while some men wore trousers, the trousers were utilitarian, not common wear in that culture or climate.

between the old and new testament Judea was in constant warfare after Alexander the Greats Generals split the area up. And they had to fight off Roman occupation, and attacks from Egypt, these men were warriors. they were not sitting around in undies and tunics.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Certainly equestrian warriors wore trousers. Also, various royal officials wore trousers. However, were trousers the common attire of the average Judean farmer, peasant, or fisherman? I propose that while some men wore trousers, the trousers were utilitarian, not common wear in that culture or climate.

Im talking about the word "breeches, they are called just the same as Exodus 28:42 so we see them in history too "And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness; from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach." So showing my whole argument true. While some keep saying its just underwear. Not the word miknas which it comes from one meaning means "trousers". So we see here one last time, God instituted these breeches for men. Not only that we historically see men soldiers wearing them as the word geber could mean some type of soldier vesture.

So Deuteronomy 22:5 plainly encompasses pants trousers and anything in the style, they are made for a man by God. So a woman shouldn't wear them is all I'm saying, for they pertain unto a man. Really severely simple.

Lets show the universal bathroom sign again.. This is plainly a gender line, we shouldn't cross.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Certainly equestrian warriors wore trousers. Also, various royal officials wore trousers. However, were trousers the common attire of the average Judean farmer, peasant, or fisherman? I propose that while some men wore trousers, the trousers were utilitarian, not common wear in that culture or climate.

Why wouldn't trousers be useful? Must be useful Chris for them to last thousands of years until today. that man wore trousers more than wrapping a cloth around them like some towel. Are wearing a robe like a sheet with a hole cut into the top of the head.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Umm Sister Amanah posted this and please answer this. And breeches are more then undergarments..

Ancient Pants

The wearing of pants in Western culture probably arose with the equestrian warrior cultures of Asia minor. The Sythians of the area encompassed by today's Ukraine, Bulgaria, and Romania wore loose pants tucked into boots. A portrait of a warrior wearing pants appears on a cup found in a burial site from 770 BC.

The Greek historian Herodotus mentions the Sythians waring pants. Herodotus also mentions that the Amazons (female warriors of Greek mythology) as clad in trousers. An Amazon depicted on a vessel in 470 BC is obviously wearing pants.

Pants were adapted from the Sythians by the Persians (of modern Iran) by the 5th century BC.

The Celts, a nomadic people of Central Europe, wore pants, though documentation is sketchy at best. The style, copied from Sythians and Persians, spread through Central Europe around the third century BC.

Ancient Greeks and Romans equated the wearing of trousers with savagery and referred to those early trouser clad people as barbarians. When the Romans conquered Celtic Briton in the first century AD, they called the Irish "wild people." But as cultures mixed, Roman soldiers took to wearing a form of pants called braccae that resembled a pair of tight Capris, and were much more appropriate for cold weather climates than togas.

Braccae is the Latin root of the word breeches, a type of knee length trouser. Braccae, however, had adjustable hems and could be worn knee length or ankle length.

The Thorsberg Trousers pictured on the right are a relic from the 4th century AC and were found in Denmark.

Damendorf Man, a bog body found in 1900, perished between 140 - 380 AD. A pair of neatly folded pants was found near the corpse.

https://bellatory.com/fashion-indust...estern-Culture