Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Certainly equestrian warriors wore trousers. Also, various royal officials wore trousers. However, were trousers the common attire of the average Judean farmer, peasant, or fisherman? I propose that while some men wore trousers, the trousers were utilitarian, not common wear in that culture or climate.

Im talking about the word "breeches, they are called just the same as Exodus 28:42 so we see them in history too "And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness; from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach." So showing my whole argument true. While some keep saying its just underwear. Not the word miknas which it comes from one meaning means "trousers". So we see here one last time, God instituted these breeches for men. Not only that we historically see men soldiers wearing them as the word geber could mean some type of soldier vesture.

So Deuteronomy 22:5 plainly encompasses pants trousers and anything in the style, they are made for a man by God. So a woman shouldn't wear them is all I'm saying, for they pertain unto a man. Really severely simple.

Lets show the universal bathroom sign again.. This is plainly a gender line, we shouldn't cross.

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Im talking about the word "breeches, they are called just the same as Exodus 28:42 so we see them in history too "And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness; from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach." So showing my whole argument true. While some keep saying its just underwear. Not the word miknas which it comes from one meaning means "trousers". So we see here one last time, God instituted these breeches for men. Not only that we historically see men soldiers wearing them as the word geber could mean some type of soldier vesture.

So Deuteronomy 22:5 plainly encompasses pants trousers and anything in the style, they are made for a man by God. So a woman shouldn't wear them is all I'm saying, for they pertain unto a man. Really severely simple.

Lets show the universal bathroom sign again.. This is plainly a gender line, we shouldn't cross.

……….ok if you wanna split hairs the passage referring to making breeches is to the priest! So staying in line with your thought process breeches would only be pertaining to males that were priest!