Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Ok I know where y'all are headed. Just pull out all stops and tear down al the fences. But like a smart man once said "before you tear down a fence, find out what its there for.." Next thing you know RuPaul is going to be singing in your choir too...

All these questions you ask Joe are a catch, don't got time for trolls..

You think its a catch because you cant explain it away.... just my question. why do you ignore the rest of Exodus 28??

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

You think its a catch because you cant explain it away.... just my question. why do you ignore the rest of Exodus 28??

What your saying is ridiculous, and its not even what were talking about. All your trying to do is get someone off topic.when in society do women have to wear a ephod, or mitre.. Matter of fact you find ephod let me know.

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

What your saying is ridiculous, and its not even what were talking about. All your trying to do is get someone off topic.when in society do women have to wear a ephod, or mitre.. Matter of fact you find ephod let me know.

Its really simple and after this I will leave you alone on this subject I had no idea you are "new" as Amanah says. To take one verse (Exodus 28:42) out of that chapter and make it a steadfast doctrine while ignoring the whole context of not just the rest of the chapter but the rest of Exodus is not sound and when you post that opinion on here you should expect some rebuttal. Now if you really want to use something to support your stance you are better off using 1 Timothy 2.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

Its really simple and after this I will leave you alone on this subject I had no idea you are "new" as Amanah says. To take one verse (Exodus 28:42) out of that chapter and make it a steadfast doctrine while ignoring the whole context of not just the rest of the chapter but the rest of Exodus is not sound and when you post that opinion on here you should expect some rebuttal. Now if you really want to use something to support your stance you are better off using 1 Timothy 2.

Amen. And when one uses I Timothy 2, no one can argue that they are falling back into legalism predicated upon Mosaic Law. It becomes an issue of principled Christian modesty. A 100% NT teaching.