Netanyahu: I will name a golan town after trump

[TK Burk]

Biblically, to be considered “Jewish,” a person would either be born of Jewish parents, born of a Jewish mother or be a gentile converted according to Old Testament Law. This latter group is known as a “proselyte.” Though proselytes converted to Judaism, they did not gain entry into a Jewish tribe, since their conversion did not add them to the already ongoing history of Jewish lineage. The only way to become part of this genealogy was to marry into it. Examples of such conversion are a Canaanite named Rahab (Rachab), and a Moabitess named Ruth. Both of these former gentiles are mentioned in Jesus’ Jewish genealogy (see Matthew 1:5). When these gentile women married their Jewish husbands, they became believers in the one true God, and they agreed to keep the Old Testament commandments (see Joshua 2:9-11; Ruth 1:16). As a result, they became members of their husband’s Jewish tribe. This is why we find both Rahab and Ruth in the lineage of Judah, and why they are both listed in the ancestry leading back to Abraham and Adam. Such inclusion into a Jewish tribe was never available for gentiles who remained in idolatry.

The Law requires that Priests provide a written lineage to prove they derived from a pure Hebrew bloodline (see Exodus 6:14-25; Numbers 3:1-5, Numbers 3:17-39, Numbers 26:57-61; Nehemiah 7:4-73; Nehemiah 12:1-26; Matthew 1:1-16; Luke 3:23-38). This evidence had to be a written account proving an untainted bloodline tracing back to the time of Abraham and Adam. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) can't—and never will—do this since it cannot prove there was never any gentile blood in their descents. The Bible disqualified a priest and his offspring if there was ever any intermingling with gentiles (see Nehemiah 7:5, Nehemiah 7:63-64; Ezra 2:61-62, Ezra 10:11-19). In addition to this, if you were a priest during the time of Herod’s Temple, you had to prove, not only Levite lineage, but also, more specifically, a lineage from the Levite tribe of Zadok (see Ezekiel 43:19, Ezekiel 44:15-17, Ezekiel 48:11-12). The Jewish lineage records were burned and destroyed during the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Thus, no such records remain that can prove an untainted bloodline dating back to the time of Adam.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Biblically, to be considered “Jewish,” a person would either be born of Jewish parents, born of a Jewish mother or be a gentile converted according to Old Testament Law. This latter group is known as a “proselyte.” Though proselytes converted to Judaism, they did not gain entry into a Jewish tribe, since their conversion did not add them to the already ongoing history of Jewish lineage. The only way to become part of this genealogy was to marry into it. Examples of such conversion are a Canaanite named Rahab (Rachab), and a Moabitess named Ruth. Both of these former gentiles are mentioned in Jesus’ Jewish genealogy (see Matthew 1:5). When these gentile women married their Jewish husbands, they became believers in the one true God, and they agreed to keep the Old Testament commandments (see Joshua 2:9-11; Ruth 1:16). As a result, they became members of their husband’s Jewish tribe. This is why we find both Rahab and Ruth in the lineage of Judah, and why they are both listed in the ancestry leading back to Abraham and Adam. Such inclusion into a Jewish tribe was never available for gentiles who remained in idolatry.

The Law requires that Priests provide a written lineage to prove they derived from a pure Hebrew bloodline (see Exodus 6:14-25; Numbers 3:1-5, Numbers 3:17-39, Numbers 26:57-61; Nehemiah 7:4-73; Nehemiah 12:1-26; Matthew 1:1-16; Luke 3:23-38). This evidence had to be a written account proving an untainted bloodline tracing back to the time of Abraham and Adam. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) can't—and never will—do this since it cannot prove there was never any gentile blood in their descents. The Bible disqualified a priest and his offspring if there was ever any intermingling with gentiles (see Nehemiah 7:5, Nehemiah 7:63-64; Ezra 2:61-62, Ezra 10:11-19). In addition to this, if you were a priest during the time of Herod’s Temple, you had to prove, not only Levite lineage, but also, more specifically, a lineage from the Levite tribe of Zadok (see Ezekiel 43:19, Ezekiel 44:15-17, Ezekiel 48:11-12). The Jewish lineage records were burned and destroyed during the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Thus, no such records remain that can prove an untainted bloodline dating back to the time of Adam.

Amen, it was never about DNA, but genealogy.
The super interesting thing about all of this is how utterly brainwashed people are concerning this subject. Circumcision was the Old Covenant mark which joined you with God and the nation. Paul was dead set against any Roman non Judean joining into the genealogical record of Physical Israel. But Zionist Christians here in the United States can’t see how the Apostle Paul viewed the whole circumcision and Judean identity thing among the Gentiles. The Judeans wanted just to convert Gentiles into physical Judeans after they were baptized in Jesus name. Which the Apostle was vehemently opposed to.

Being called anti Semitic over this issue just shows how confused the other side can be. Dispensationalism is to blame. A Jewish formulated teaching.

[votivesoul]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Biblically, to be considered “Jewish,” a person would either be born of Jewish parents, born of a Jewish mother or be a gentile converted according to Old Testament Law. This latter group is known as a “proselyte.” Though proselytes converted to Judaism, they did not gain entry into a Jewish tribe, since their conversion did not add them to the already ongoing history of Jewish lineage. The only way to become part of this genealogy was to marry into it. Examples of such conversion are a Canaanite named Rahab (Rachab), and a Moabitess named Ruth. Both of these former gentiles are mentioned in Jesus’ Jewish genealogy (see Matthew 1:5). When these gentile women married their Jewish husbands, they became believers in the one true God, and they agreed to keep the Old Testament commandments (see Joshua 2:9-11; Ruth 1:16). As a result, they became members of their husband’s Jewish tribe. This is why we find both Rahab and Ruth in the lineage of Judah, and why they are both listed in the ancestry leading back to Abraham and Adam. Such inclusion into a Jewish tribe was never available for gentiles who remained in idolatry.

The Law requires that Priests provide a written lineage to prove they derived from a pure Hebrew bloodline (see Exodus 6:14-25; Numbers 3:1-5, Numbers 3:17-39, Numbers 26:57-61; Nehemiah 7:4-73; Nehemiah 12:1-26; Matthew 1:1-16; Luke 3:23-38). This evidence had to be a written account proving an untainted bloodline tracing back to the time of Abraham and Adam. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) can't—and never will—do this since it cannot prove there was never any gentile blood in their descents. The Bible disqualified a priest and his offspring if there was ever any intermingling with gentiles (see Nehemiah 7:5, Nehemiah 7:63-64; Ezra 2:61-62, Ezra 10:11-19). In addition to this, if you were a priest during the time of Herod’s Temple, you had to prove, not only Levite lineage, but also, more specifically, a lineage from the Levite tribe of Zadok (see Ezekiel 43:19, Ezekiel 44:15-17, Ezekiel 48:11-12). The Jewish lineage records were burned and destroyed during the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Thus, no such records remain that can prove an untainted bloodline dating back to the time of Adam.

Isn't this where Dispensationalists chime in and state that when the second beast who comes up out of the earth with two horns like a lamb but speaks like a dragon comes along and calls down fire, consuming the sacrifice on the altar in a rebuilt third temple, and so, lineages and genealogies be damned?

Which is to say, Jews will believe this beast is sent from God because of his supernatural power, that he is in fact Elijah who was to come, and all that?

At that point the Scripture test will be of no import.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by votivesoul

Isn't this where Dispensationalists chime in and state that when the second beast who comes up out of the earth with two horns like a lamb but speaks like a dragon comes along and calls down fire, consuming the sacrifice on the altar in a rebuilt third temple, and so, lineages and genealogies be damned?

Which is to say, Jews will believe this beast is sent from God because of his supernatural power, that he is in fact Elijah who was to come, and all that?

At that point the Scripture test will be of no import.

Don't forget the flying monkeys with scorpion stinger missiles. Burlap bag shirt prophets with rope sandals and white knee socks. Satan in a flying saucer being guided by Tom Cruise and Elton John. Brother Irvin Baxter Jr, will have a live show on the mount of olives where Bill Clinton will shake hands with Donald Trump on the white house lawn. Indicating the stopping of the sacrifice at Mikeska's BBQ in El Capo Texas. Thank God he will, because that BBQ, ain't fit to eat. It is dryer than a mummy's pocket.

[TGBTG]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Don't forget the flying monkeys with scorpion stinger missiles. Burlap bag shirt prophets with rope sandals and white knee socks. Satan in a flying saucer being guided by Tom Cruise and Elton John. Brother Irvin Baxter Jr, will have a live show on the mount of olives where Bill Clinton will shake hands with Donald Trump on the white house lawn. Indicating the stopping of the sacrifice at Mikeska's BBQ in El Capo Texas. Thank God he will, because that BBQ, ain't fit to eat. It is dryer than a mummy's pocket.

your imagination is something else..hahaha