Quote:
|
Have you ever considered that his responses to you are what they are, NOT because he's "hiding" something, but because perhaps you yourself have brought on those kinds of responses?
|
I brought them on by asking him to present his belief in a straight forward manner so I and others would know what they are?
Quote:
|
The guy's been around since, what? The days of the original FCF? If anyone genuinely doesnt know his eschatology it is either because they are new here, or willfully ignorant. Like I have been saying, the only people who seem to actually have any communication problems with him are certain individuals who have some kind of personal problem with him. Usually due to him pointing out some silliness on their part, then they double down on the silliness, and then they get trolled ("taunted" and "tormented").
|
Was I being willfully ignorant by asking him what it was he DOES believe? Many times? I even asked him on THIS THREAD. He did not answer here either after all that.
It is YOU who have pointed out to me what he has taught here before in his own words. At any time he could have done that. Then if anyone cared the discussion could have moved forward.
What you rightly describe as "taunting" and "tormenting" is very accurate. I guess its ok because I am so silly.
Quote:
I distinctly remember several times you made a statement, and when *I* asked you to clarify all I got in response was a bunch of questions from you followed by what looked like gloating about how I wouldn't and couldn't answer your questions because obviously I was lacking in any kind of actual doctrine. I think they call that "projection", maybe?
Getting straightforward answers usually requires a certain amount of respect for the questioner. When that is missing the questioner shouldn't really expect anything.
|
Thats funny I think I remember the same kind of thing coming from you in some of our discussions!
I do appreciate the link you sent and I respect your teaching on various issues,
Threaded Mode
