Coronavirus contains HIV genes

[n david]

Originally Posted by Barb

No disrespect, but are you an attorney at law? How do you know it is unconstitutional to temporarily ban large gatherings for health and safety reasons? Again, not being confrontational... just asking for clarification...

I'm not a Constitutional attorney, but I don't find anywhere that a ban was allowed, especially for religious expression of worship.

I believe it would be dismissed as unconstitutional.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by n david

I'm not a Constitutional attorney, but I don't find anywhere that a ban was allowed, especially for religious expression of worship.

I believe it would be dismissed as unconstitutional.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by n david

I'm not a Constitutional attorney, but I don't find anywhere that a ban was allowed, especially for religious expression of worship.

I believe it would be dismissed as unconstitutional.

Nobody follows the Bill of Rights anymore.

Besides, isn't that a state issue?

Fun fact: We've been operating under a national emergency continuously since AT LEAST 1933.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Nobody follows the Bill of Rights anymore.

Besides, isn't that a state issue?

Fun fact: We've been operating under a national emergency continuously since AT LEAST 1933.

Oh yes 1933, when the wealthy took the opportunity to raid the temple. 1933 when the law was passed to make it illegal to own gold bullion. Us lower cast can’t free ourselves from statecraft usuary. Let’s do what we are told while Lee Greenwood sings in the background.