Trump 2nd Impeachment- 2 opposing views

[Scott Pitta]

The executive branch attacked the legislative branch.

Charge Trump with sedition or treason.

Let the chips fall where they may.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

The executive branch attacked the legislative branch.

Charge Trump with sedition or treason.

Let the chips fall where they may.

He has a Constitutional right to free speech. And he didn’t say anything that promoted a riot.

The Democrats are hypocrites in the highest order with their members fomenting violent speech all last spring and summer.

[Michael The Disciple]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

He has a Constitutional right to free speech. And he didn’t say anything that promoted a riot.

The Democrats are hypocrites in the highest order with their members fomenting violent speech all last spring and summer.

Absolutely!

[Michael The Disciple]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

He has a Constitutional right to free speech. And he didn’t say anything that promoted a riot.

The Democrats are hypocrites in the highest order with their members fomenting violent speech all last spring and summer.

Absolutely!

No way will they stop with impeachment. They will try hard to get Trump in prison.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Absolutely!

No way will they stop with impeachment. They will try hard to get Trump in prison.

Exactly!

[Pressing-On]

President Trump Announces ‘Office of the Former President’ – Will Carry On the Agenda of the Trump Administration

https://t.me/real_DonaldJTrump/13371

[Pressing-On]

“Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.”

This is the language that Schumer brought up today and emphasized “AND disqualification, etc...”

So, I am thinking that if they can’t impeach him, they will try for the second part, disqualification, as though it can be a separate issue.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

“Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.”

This is the language that Schumer brought up today and emphasized “AND disqualification, etc...”

So, I am thinking that if they can’t impeach him, they will try for the second part, disqualification, as though it can be a separate issue.

Great. Just heard Jordan Sekula’s say that this Constitutional wording is a “combo” and if you can’t remove him, you can’t disqualify him.

Good to know.

[1 God]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

“Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.”

This is the language that Schumer brought up today and emphasized “AND disqualification, etc...”

So, I am thinking that if they can’t impeach him, they will try for the second part, disqualification, as though it can be a separate issue.

This tells me that the Dems realize they pulled off a fraudulent election, and they don't wand anyone digging deeper.

[aegsm76]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

The executive branch attacked the legislative branch.

Charge Trump with sedition or treason.

Let the chips fall where they may.

Says a totally non-biased observer...

What do you call the Russia Hoax...

What do you call the numerous congressmen and numerous other BHO staff who stated in public and on MSM that they had proof, but when they testified to Congress stated (under oath) that they had no evidence.
Were those lies an attack?

C'mon man...