|
Tab Menu 1
| The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF. |
 |
|
02-24-2007, 07:51 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManOfWord
I'll give this one a try as well: It is a "simple" 3 step plan
#1 Repentance is similar to "conception."
#2 Water baptism, in Jesus' name washes away sin.
#3 Holy Ghost baptism, speaking in tongues "certifies" that you are now rapture ready.
NOTE: One is not rapture ready until the completion of step #3
The logical conclusion of this view is that NO ONE from Pentecost until now will make the rapture other than those who have followed the 3 step plan.
|
Oh, I don't know about that last little dig - friend.
I am a tee-total three stepper. All I know is what I see in the word that Peter preached at Pentecost. I just preach what's there. I'm not God, and it would be foolish of me to question his plan.
I have never been in the business of deciding who will be in Heaven, and who will be in Hell. There is only one Judge. I'm not him. So, I'll just keep on preaching truth, and leave the saving up to Him. 
|
02-24-2007, 07:52 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Oh, I don't know about that last little dig - friend.
I am a tee-total three stepper. All I know is what I see in the word that Peter preached at Pentecost. I just preach what's there. I'm not God, and it would be foolish of me to question his plan.
I have never been in the business of deciding who will be in Heaven, and who will be in Hell. There is only one Judge. I'm not him. So, I'll just keep on preaching truth, and leave the saving up to Him. |
PP ... it's how it's taught by many .... 
|
02-24-2007, 07:56 PM
|
 |
Step By Step - Day By Day
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,648
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PastorPoster
All I know is what I see in the word that Peter preached at Pentecost. I just preach what's there. I'm not God, and it would be foolish of me to question his plan.
|
But you see boys .... this is the thing ....... we all preach and teach Acts 2:38 and we all get the same results!!
__________________
Smiles & Blessings....
~Felicity Welsh~
(surname courtesy of Jim Yohe)
|
02-24-2007, 09:00 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity
But you see boys .... this is the thing ....... we all preach and teach Acts 2:38 and we all get the same results!! |
Before I turn in, let me say that this is a good point that no one seemed to jump on, and it leads me to ask...
Remembering folks that I am of the 'PAJC' view, if we all get the same results, is it that important at what point salvation takes place?! Are we reaching too hard for the differences rather than building on that which we agree?!
|
02-24-2007, 09:22 PM
|
 |
Jesus' Name Pentecostal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
Before I turn in, let me say that this is a good point that no one seemed to jump on, and it leads me to ask...
Remembering folks that I am of the 'PAJC' view, if we all get the same results, is it that important at what point salvation takes place?! Are we reaching too hard for the differences rather than building on that which we agree?!
|
Wasn't that the idea when two groups merged in 1945 and agreed to disagree around a "fundamental doctrine statement" and allowed both views to be presented in their new magazine called "The Pentecostal Herald"?
__________________
Sam also known as Jim Ellis
Apostolic in doctrine
Pentecostal in experience
Charismatic in practice
Non-denominational in affiliation
Inter-denominational in fellowship
|
02-24-2007, 09:23 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
Wasn't that the idea when two groups merged in 1945 and agreed to disagree around a "fundamental doctrine statement" and allowed both views to be presented in their new magazine called "The Pentecostal Herald"?
|
Kinda seems like it, Bro. Sam...
|
02-25-2007, 05:48 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity
But you see boys .... this is the thing ....... we all preach and teach Acts 2:38 and we all get the same results!! |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
Before I turn in, let me say that this is a good point that no one seemed to jump on, and it leads me to ask...
Remembering folks that I am of the 'PAJC' view, if we all get the same results, is it that important at what point salvation takes place?! Are we reaching too hard for the differences rather than building on that which we agree?!
|
Thought I'd bump these posts and see if anyone else cares to chime in with a response...I like Bro. Sam's point...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
Wasn't that the idea when two groups merged in 1945 and agreed to disagree around a "fundamental doctrine statement" and allowed both views to be presented in their new magazine called "The Pentecostal Herald"?
|
|
02-25-2007, 10:30 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
Originally Posted by Felicity
But you see boys .... this is the thing ....... we all preach and teach Acts 2:38 and we all get the same results!!
Originally Posted by Barb
Before I turn in, let me say that this is a good point that no one seemed to jump on, and it leads me to ask...
Remembering folks that I am of the 'PAJC' view, if we all get the same results, is it that important at what point salvation takes place?! Are we reaching too hard for the differences rather than building on that which we agree?!
Originally Posted by Sam
Wasn't that the idea when two groups merged in 1945 and agreed to disagree around a "fundamental doctrine statement" and allowed both views to be presented in their new magazine called "The Pentecostal Herald"?
___________________________________
Thought I'd bump these posts and see if anyone else cares to chime in with a response...I like Bro. Sam's point...what say ye?!
|
02-25-2007, 01:20 PM
|
 |
Honorary Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
Wasn't that the idea when two groups merged in 1945 and agreed to disagree around a "fundamental doctrine statement" and allowed both views to be presented in their new magazine called "The Pentecostal Herald"?
|
That is the "fly in the ointment" of the whole discussion and has been for quite some time. The problem is, IMO, the that some of the PAJC'ers polarized so much that they could no longer tolerate the PCI'ers, so the "exlax contingency" (AS) was executed by those who felt the urge to purge. 
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant http://www.newlife-church.org
|
02-24-2007, 08:01 PM
|
|
Honorary Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Oh, I don't know about that last little dig - friend.
I am a tee-total three stepper. All I know is what I see in the word that Peter preached at Pentecost. I just preach what's there. I'm not God, and it would be foolish of me to question his plan.
I have never been in the business of deciding who will be in Heaven, and who will be in Hell. There is only one Judge. I'm not him. So, I'll just keep on preaching truth, and leave the saving up to Him. |
No dig, friend! That is an Epleyism.
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant http://www.newlife-church.org
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40 PM.
| |
