Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2007, 01:32 PM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy View Post
Sounds like you are more worried about your reputation than exhausting all means to communicate the Gospel.

If it lead ONE person to Jesus wouldn't it be worth it? If it lead or compelled someone to tell someone else or lead them to the Lord, wouldn't it be worth it?

What is the worth of one soul? Can you be so sure it won't be effective to reach that ONE soul?

I think your post characterizes the entire mentality of reputation above all things, including souls.
This strawman would hold credulance more so if those on TV were having sweeping numbers due to TV alone as outreach.

Even business marketing will tell you the best form of growth is one-on-one referrals. TV is expensive and about as effective as direct maill 1 % of saturation.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2007, 02:14 PM
Brother Strange
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
This strawman would hold credulance more so if those on TV were having sweeping numbers due to TV alone as outreach.
A good sales campaign always has support from various segments of the enterprise. The marketing segment alone cannot make for a successful enterprise. That is pretty much a given.

Quote:
Even business marketing will tell you the best form of growth is one-on-one referrals. TV is expensive and about as effective as direct maill 1 % of saturation.
T.V. is expensive but I never of Swaggart or even Bishop Fulton Sheen paying for it out of their own bank account. Viewers heaped money upon them as they are now doing upon Paul and Jan Crotch. Drunks will send in money to support it as will people who will never go to church...regardless.

But as far as the one-on-one marketing campaign is concerned, I would agree with you. But, so far as I know, there is not an Apostolic denomination that is conducting a one-on-one campaign except the Mormons and the Jehovah Witnesses...and they are not Apostolic. Perhaps your church is conducting a successful one-on-one campaign?

In regards to the statistics that you quoted about direct mail vs t.v. saturation, this is a statistic that I would keep to myself, careful to not let that number get out, if I were against t.v. promotion. That one percent is a powerfully compelling argument FOR t.v. World population is 5 + billion souls. One percent of that would be enough to make a couple of angels rejoice over their salvation.

I once visited with a Lutheran pastor that I knew when he first moved to Houston to begin a church. Now, only a few years later on this certain visit, he told me that he now had more than two thousand members and a nice new sanctuary and a school too. I marveled that he had accomplished so much in about ten or twelve years. I asked him how did he do it? He explained that he had received a Parish from his denomination to work with only a very few people to work with in the beginning. He then got those automatic telephone dialing machines that called people all day long up until 9:00 PM with a message. He had several of those things working day and night, seven days. At some point, his congregation built up high enough to reach critical mass. From there, things sort of took off. At the time of the visit, he no longer had the automatic telephone dialing machines.

I don't know if that would work today since people have become so resistant to those dumb machines calling you just about the time you sit down to eat or go to the bathroom. But, television is still the most powerful marketing device ever invented. At least, people can elect to turn those things on or off at will.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2007, 06:53 PM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
This strawman would hold credulance more so if those on TV were having sweeping numbers due to TV alone as outreach.

Even business marketing will tell you the best form of growth is one-on-one referrals. TV is expensive and about as effective as direct maill 1 % of saturation.
Hate to burst your bubble Boom...but you cant argue with facts...so here is facts..

in 2006 we spent 30,000 in funeral home commercials that were professionally done by MKJ Marketing and here were our results..
We gained 18 funerals last year and THE most given reason for using us was "We saw your lovely family on your tv ads."
So BOOM...it increased my call volume by 18 and my $$$ by 126,000.


Imagine if just ONE soul says...we are here because we saw your ad.
I say its worth every penny and even the fuss the Cons are kicking up!!!!

It all boils down to this question...HOW valuable is a soul?????????

I cannot believe we are even voting on such a stupid question!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:05 PM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
Hate to burst your bubble Boom...but you cant argue with facts...so here is facts..

in 2006 we spent 30,000 in funeral home commercials that were professionally done by MKJ Marketing and here were our results..
We gained 18 funerals last year and THE most given reason for using us was "We saw your lovely family on your tv ads."
So BOOM...it increased my call volume by 18 and my $$$ by 126,000.


Imagine if just ONE soul says...we are here because we saw your ad.
I say its worth every penny and even the fuss the Cons are kicking up!!!!

It all boils down to this question...HOW valuable is a soul?????????

I cannot believe we are even voting on such a stupid question!
Tell me how this related to a church at all?

Tell me how the Articles of Faith you agree to bi-annually. (I think it is this year we all sign new cards) tell me how the AOF can allow a man to have a TV when the bylaws say the man cannot.

Great news on the business. Still no ALJC churches of 10000 I have heard of. The only one I heard of was the one in Tennessee using Limos to pick up people including Sunday school kids in.



How many churches even attempt a Radio Ad costing $1000 either?
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:44 PM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
Tell me how this related to a church at all?

Tell me how the Articles of Faith you agree to bi-annually. (I think it is this year we all sign new cards) tell me how the AOF can allow a man to have a TV when the bylaws say the man cannot.

Great news on the business. Still no ALJC churches of 10000 I have heard of. The only one I heard of was the one in Tennessee using Limos to pick up people including Sunday school kids in.



How many churches even attempt a Radio Ad costing $1000 either?
As a DS told me.....the Articles of Faith are the acts 2 new birth messagge.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:50 PM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
Tell me how this related to a church at all?

Tell me how the Articles of Faith you agree to bi-annually. (I think it is this year we all sign new cards) tell me how the AOF can allow a man to have a TV when the bylaws say the man cannot.

Great news on the business. Still no ALJC churches of 10000 I have heard of. The only one I heard of was the one in Tennessee using Limos to pick up people including Sunday school kids in.



How many churches even attempt a Radio Ad costing $1000 either?
And once again you prove that the AS was a sham and a slam on the spirit of our merger!

As far as the ALJC goes......They also have had TV and maintained "holiness".
MOST of the guys think TV will take away from holiness.
Not a good idea on your part to use the ALJC as an example of why NOT to have tv.

I will be among the many hundreds that will sign my card.......and the rest is history.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-17-2007, 10:54 PM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
And once again you prove that the AS was a sham and a slam on the spirit of our merger!

As far as the ALJC goes......They also have had TV and maintained "holiness".
MOST of the guys think TV will take away from holiness.
Not a good idea on your part to use the ALJC as an example of why NOT to have tv.

I will be among the many hundreds that will sign my card.......and the rest is history.
Your pretense is that this is all you need to win the world.

I hope you prove us wrong by this time next year, if but for the sake of millions lost. I know I could give thousands to a Bible School over seas and know that for every xx dollars, a soul is won over there. WITHOUT a TV.

I see the AOG in the 60's and the PAW in the 70's showed once TV was let loose, it was all downhill.

If you actually feel you can have Hollywood in your home, maybe you did not remember reading the manual. My District gave me a lengthy involved app where I had to tell Section, Verse, and Paragraph where Ministers are Forbidden to have Television in their homes. I never shirked at saying I still believe that to be true today. I do not have to send in a letter of denial or answer for what is in my home. I can tell you what is NOT there.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:29 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
Hate to burst your bubble Boom...but you cant argue with facts...so here is facts..

in 2006 we spent 30,000 in funeral home commercials that were professionally done by MKJ Marketing and here were our results..
We gained 18 funerals last year and THE most given reason for using us was "We saw your lovely family on your tv ads."
So BOOM...it increased my call volume by 18 and my $$$ by 126,000.


Imagine if just ONE soul says...we are here because we saw your ad.
I say its worth every penny and even the fuss the Cons are kicking up!!!!

It all boils down to this question...HOW valuable is a soul?????????

I cannot believe we are even voting on such a stupid question!

Dan, thanks for sharing these numbers. Is the $30,000.00 increase in advertising a good buy when only realizing a gross increase of $126,000.00?

In my business I try to keep the advertising budget at about 6-8% of gross. I am just curious and realize the nature of business and overhead dictates different strategies.

On the issue of the thread I agree, it is, or rather should be, a non-issue.

Steve
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:46 PM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
Dan, thanks for sharing these numbers. Is the $30,000.00 increase in advertising a good buy when only realizing a gross increase of $126,000.00?

In my business I try to keep the advertising budget at about 6-8% of gross. I am just curious and realize the nature of business and overhead dictates different strategies.

On the issue of the thread I agree, it is, or rather should be, a non-issue.

Steve
It was an upfront production cost of 30,000.00...we run them 5 times a day on fox, cnn, lifetime and discovery.....for 7$ per 30 second commercial.

Once the initial investment is over....its just smooth sailing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-17-2007, 09:15 PM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
It was an upfront production cost of 30,000.00...we run them 5 times a day on fox, cnn, lifetime and discovery.....for 7$ per 30 second commercial.

Once the initial investment is over....its just smooth sailing.
BUMP for HOOVER!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apostolic Women...Apostolic Nuns... Carpenter Deep Waters 168 03-14-2010 09:34 AM
Article on Bro. TFT Sam Fellowship Hall 8 07-11-2007 11:38 PM
Another Television Article Elihu Fellowship Hall 28 05-27-2007 11:42 PM
Newseek Article on Internet TV deacon blues The Newsroom 1 05-24-2007 09:24 AM
Old Magazine Article Sam The Library 19 03-31-2007 08:26 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.