You may have missed an earlier point when I stated legalists consistently change principles to fit their dogma. See how they compare with leglists today. Not much difference. And the homosexual operates the same way the pharisees did but with a lot less religion. Even that may be debatable.
I am not an apostolic by anyone's definition. There are more definitions of apostolics than nekkid elbows on the beach. The word apostolic is a term man made so they have something to brag about. I'd rather make my boast in the Lord and not in a self grandoising word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
ANYONE, Legalist or NON legalist, can be inconsistant. That is NOT THE definition of a legalist and if it is then you should be comparing a legalist to everyone or everyone is a legalist because I have rarely seen a person that was never NOT inconsistant at any time in their lives. Just showing an example does not mean definition. The Pharisees also ate beef, does that make all beef eaters legalists?
Are you sure that is irony?
It's fine with me. I NEVER disputed the dictionary definition of the word Apostolic. I admitted Oneness Pentecostals have their OWN definition.
Well here is an interesting conundrum....do you agree with that definition or do you have your own here too?
|
__________________
A religious spirit allows people to tolerate hatred and anger under the guise of passion and holiness. Bill Johnson
Legalism has no pity on people. Legalism makes my opinion your burden, makes opinion your boundary, makes my opinion your obligation-Lucado
Some get spiritual because they see the light. Others because they feel the heat.Ray Wylie Hubbard
Definition of legalism- Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. TV
|
Threaded Mode
