A Night of Supernatural Events

[Theresa]

besides, what about you saying "you dont know my private coversations with RW" is so damaging to his stand that you couldnt have shared it pages ago?

[Theresa]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

My initial contact w/ RW was a request I made for him not to clarify his position ... of which he did little ... only because he'd lose this one no matter what. I've seen this happen before.

another thing..

WHY would you do this?? what business is it of yours HIS position and why would you request he NOT clarify?????????


that doesnt make a lick of sense

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Theresa

besides, what about you saying "you dont know my private coversations with RW" is so damaging to his stand that you couldnt have shared it pages ago?

Maybe we should start peeping into PMs? oloroid I think not.

[Coonskinner]

Originally Posted by Theresa

oh please


nice try tho

Theresa, what we have here is the old "Why is ever'body always pickin' on me?" gambit.

It is usually deployed as sort of a hail mary pass when he has been pretty thoroughly debunked, and damage control is the only thing left.

Look for there to be veiled comments about why MOW left and Renda is on vacation.

Admin is unfair, the cons are taking over, etc.

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Welcome folks to another tour of the Grand Ballroom of Dancing around an answer to a direct question.

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Was the same standard used w/ various of Brother Strange's prophecies ... one of his own ... and another prophecy that came from SC? Some of those calling for blood here were the same detractors in those threads. [and I don't mean Admin]

Yes. and yet there is a clear difference. we are not talking about someone speaking of future events. we are talking about a preacher that reached out to someone in pain via the Holy Ghost and that man being called a Charlatan.

SC clearly was challenged on his MESSAGE which is now quite different from what it once was. he was not attacked for the prophecy he gave.

You have the capasity to be objective. I dont understand why you arent.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Theresa

another thing..

WHY would you do this?? what business is it of yours HIS position and why would you request he NOT clarify?????????


that doesnt make a lick of sense

It would be for naught and would have been best to let this thread die ... as to avoid what we see now ...

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Ferd

Yes. and yet there is a clear difference. we are not talking about someone speaking of future events. we are talking about a preacher that reached out to someone in pain via the Holy Ghost and that man being called a Charlatan.

SC clearly was challenged on his MESSAGE which is now quite different from what it once was. he was not attacked for the prophecy he gave.

You have the capasity to be objective. I dont understand why you arent.

Type of gift bears no issue here ... integrity is at issue here ... no?

[revrandy]

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

Yes, I am saying I STRONGLY doubt the words of the preacher and his words of knowledge.

Now the story about the $1000 gifts and the resulting "rewards" it totally believable..... but I have major problems with the initial post.

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

No point missed ... just the person ... premises remain the same eve with the shadows of doubt casted.

Seems pretty clear here what Dan was saying..

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

My initial contact w/ RW was a request I made for him not to clarify his position ... of which he did little ... only because he'd lose this one no matter what. I've seen this happen before.

then you bare some responsibility for his being banned.