Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley
I know for a fact they have been doing this for 40yrs. Nothing new here.
|
Being from the Oklahoma district, I can assure you that this is true. That said, I am concerned because of them
reemphasizing this matter and making a very clear distinction between "conduct unbecoming a minister" and "under question". This distinction almost makes a new category that is very vague and ambiguous and an aggressive District Board, regardless their lean or position, could use this to put men under question for not liking the way they part their hair.