Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin
Barna published his methodology. The technique IS valid.
If you read the post I was actually agreeing with you. Interpreting results is where the false conclusions come to play. AND as I pointed out MOST on this forum would strongly disagree with his definitions of "Charismatic" and "Pentecostal"
(As an aside are you always this hard on people trying to agree with you?)
|
??
I don't see how you thought I was being "hard" on you. Lets not be so thin-skinned, brother.
Indeed, I did see where you were agreeing with me on certain points.
However, I just
1...disagreed with the contention that his methodology was valid (primarily because I think the criteria/questions he employed don't go to the traditional definition of what "
pentecostal/charismatic" has long meant), and
2... went on to further state that the bigger issue is not his methodology but the
conclusions his poll will lead many to (i.e. "100 million Pentecostals/Charismatics").
Threaded Mode
