Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2008, 09:28 AM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amos View Post
Yeah...they've moved on to debating weightier matters, like whether to ordain homosexuals.

and this ought to give all the XPentecostals pause for thought.

I just read today where TD Jakes is meeting with soul force (gay christian group) to see if they have common ground.

20 years ago he was still preaching standards in Apalchia
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:18 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

In my opinion, it is none of my business how a brother or sister dresses. That is between them and their Lord. I am not their judge ----God is.
__________________
Sam also known as Jim Ellis

Apostolic in doctrine
Pentecostal in experience
Charismatic in practice
Non-denominational in affiliation
Inter-denominational in fellowship
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:26 PM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
In my opinion, it is none of my business how a brother or sister dresses. That is between them and their Lord. I am not their judge ----God is.
Very True Sam

But many have taught levels of holiness according to dress standards.
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:56 PM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

You folks are edvidently afraid to touch those last posts I just posted
# 201/ 203

some things make you wonder .....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:59 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
You folks are edvidently afraid to touch those last posts I just posted
# 201/ 203

some things make you wonder .....
That's because your one pre-text tells us that we must accept that pants are solely men's apparel ... which they are not ....

There is a verse that tells a woman to marry her rapist in Deut 22 ... do we obey that too?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:01 PM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
That's because your one pre-text tells us that we must accept that pants are solely men's apparel ... which they are not ....

There is a verse that tells a woman to marry her rapist in Deut 22 ... do we obey that too?

Dan, aren't we suppose to Rightly divide the Old testament ?

Civil Law, Ceremonial Law, Moral Law ??? If we do away with all of the OT then that would have to include the 10 commandments
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:05 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
Dan, aren't we suppose to Rightly divide the Old testament ?

Civil Law, Ceremonial Law, Moral Law ??? If we do away with all of the OT then that would have to include the 10 commandments
Are you for real, Mark ... now we must obey all OT commandments ...???

Think about what you just said.

I understand that your tradition and/or conviction is important to you ...

Subjugating women to a a Norman Rockwell painting that you mistake for God's Holiness is not bible .... it's extrabiblical.

You have no bible for your pants position ... none ... there .... it is not God's Word, Mark. It's in your head.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:59 PM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
and this ought to give all the XPentecostals pause for thought.

I just read today where TD Jakes is meeting with soul force (gay christian group) to see if they have common ground.

20 years ago he was still preaching standards in Apalchia
Where did you read this?
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:03 PM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by cneasttx View Post
Where did you read this?


http://gcmwatch.wordpress.com/2008/0...tian-friendly/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:01 PM
Baron1710's Avatar
Baron1710 Baron1710 is offline
Cross-examine it!


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
If we can Do away with Duet 22 then whose to say we can do away with the scripture in Lev. that says that lying with man and man is an abomination???

Isn't there a difference between the civil laws of Israel and moral laws that are timeless ??
.
Well to start with we are rejecting your interpretation not Scripture. No I do not believe there is a difference between moral law and civil law James tells us its all one law.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StMark View Post
and this ought to give all the XPentecostals pause for thought.

I just read today where TD Jakes is meeting with soul force (gay christian group) to see if they have common ground.

20 years ago he was still preaching standards in Apalchia
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH here we all go down the slippery slope...just a silly argument that doesn't deserve a response.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**** Are the NCO and AWCF "raiding" the UPCI or providing a "safety net"? **** SDG The D.A.'s Office 373 02-06-2012 12:01 AM
Has "Church" become a "Family Business"?? SecretWarrior Fellowship Hall 70 06-09-2008 07:41 AM
What Does "Joint" or "Fellow" Heirs with Christ? Praxeas Fellowship Hall 2 01-13-2008 01:12 AM
It seems the word "Seperation" varies as much as "Holiness" does??? revrandy Fellowship Hall 20 09-29-2007 11:39 AM
Seven kids get "it" or "Him" at youth camp Sherri Fellowship Hall 10 07-16-2007 12:57 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.