WWOD vs Dan: Who would take the crown?

[CC1]

I know which one I think is intellectually superior! (and it is not the one I agree with the most - LOL).

I am not convinced this would be a fruitful debate. DA is not measured enough of a poster for a civil debate. I fear he would quickly resort to the quick insult. Nothing in his posting past has shown me he would be a good debater. Good insulter yes. Good infuriator, yes.

On the other hand it would depend on which WWOD showed up as to the quality of his debate! Armed with great intellect WWOD brings to the table a lot. If the good WWOD showed up it would allow for some fascinating posts. I greatly enjoyed reading 90% of his posts and wanted to strangle him for the other 10% LOL!! (the reverse percentage holds for DA's posts). If the bad WWOD showed up (and we don't have a clue as to what triggers him to appear - bad day at work?) it would quickly devolve into the kind of dialogue that would get both permanently banned forthwith!

JMHO

[Ron]

Originally Posted by CC1

I know which one I think is intellectually superior! (and it is not the one I agree with the most - LOL).

I am not convinced this would be a fruitful debate. DA is not measured enough of a poster for a civil debate. I fear he would quickly resort to the quick insult. Nothing in his posting past has shown me he would be a good debater. Good insulter yes. Good infuriator, yes.

On the other hand it would depend on which WWOD showed up as to the quality of his debate! Armed with great intellect WWOD brings to the table a lot. If the good WWOD showed up it would allow for some fascinating posts. I greatly enjoyed reading 90% of his posts and wanted to strangle him for the other 10% LOL!! (the reverse percentage holds for DA's posts). If the bad WWOD showed up (and we don't have a clue as to what triggers him to appear - bad day at work?) it would quickly devolve into the kind of dialogue that would get both permanently banned forthwith!

JMHO

I think we have a bingo!
Perfect perception CC1.