Witchcraft = medication

[clgustaveson]

Originally Posted by Oneness Man

No, that doesn't mean he practiced medicine. Luke was an Apostle first and then a physician second. He would probably pray for you first and you would be healed.

I know of a doctor who would pray for you and wouldn't charge you, but if he had to prescribe you medication and look at what ailed you, then he would charge you. Sounds like a wise physician to me.

You don't even know what practicing medicine is apparently.

No, Luke was a physician long before he was an apostle. Jesus picked Luke, not some sorcerer. The fact is that Luke was not in a dual situation. He was not at one hand a Jesus lover then if that failed he went to witchcraft. Come on! You are stretching was is evident. There would be no need to call Luke a physician if he was not.... Besides I guess that makes God the "Great Witch".

Your argument just keeps getting more ridiculous as you try to pull things out of nowhere.

Originally Posted by clgustaveson

You don't even know what practicing medicine is apparently.

No, Luke was a physician long before he was an apostle. Come on! You are stretching was is evident. There would be no need to call Luke a physician if he was not.... Besides I guess that makes God the "Great Witch".

Your argument just keeps getting more ridiculous as you try to pull things out of nowhere.

You are ridiculous to think that the scripture was talking about doctors, it was not. The scripture was talking about pharmacists, which is why you are so adamant against the truth of that scripture.

You called God, the "Great Witch", not me.

You haven't proven your case against what the scripture says and you don't even know how to do it in an intelligent manner, which is pathetic.

[clgustaveson]

Originally Posted by Oneness Man

You are ridiculous to think that the scripture was talking about doctors, it was not. The scripture was talking about pharmacists, which is why you are so adamant against the truth of that scripture.

You called God, the "Great Witch", not me.

You haven't proven your case against what the scripture says and you don't even know how to do it in an intelligent manner, which is pathetic.

You are kidding right? I never said the scripture spoke of either, I am saying it speaks of crazy ludicrous tree worship. In the days of the Bible there was no distinction between the two, there was not a pharmaceutical company that gave the physicians medication. Thats absurd!

Doctors practice medicine, the same way a pharmacist practices medicine. The doctor uses techniques and what not that are parallel to the processes used in pharmacology. You obviously don't know half what a doctor does.

I hope you take the time and learn about the history and the present state of the fields before you even consider replying because it is obvious you know nothing about what doctors/pharmacists do/did.

Originally Posted by clgustaveson

You are kidding right? I never said the scripture spoke of either, I am saying it speaks of crazy ludicrous tree worship. In the days of the Bible there was no distinction between the two, there was not a pharmaceutical company that gave the physicians medication. Thats absurd!

Doctors practice medicine, the same way a pharmacist practices medicine. The doctor uses techniques and what not that are parallel to the processes used in pharmacology. You obviously don't know half what a doctor does.

I hope you take the time and learn about the history and the present state of the fields before you even consider replying because it is obvious you know nothing about what doctors/pharmacists do/did.

You are bringing up a red herring. I never brought up doctors you did, which doesn't make a lick of sense, because it was talking about pharmacists, not doctors.

When you can discuss in an intelligent manner, then let me know, because you doing nothing but ranting and raving and have proven nothing.

[clgustaveson]

Originally Posted by Oneness Man

You are bringing up a red herring. I never brought up doctors you did, which doesn't make a lick of sense, because it was talking about pharmacists, not doctors.

When you can discuss in an intelligent manner, then let me know, because you doing nothing but ranting and raving and have proven nothing.

Like I said apparently you have no clue... I don't want to deal with this argument from square one.

Go through medical school and pharmacology, learn the history and then try to compare them. I don't think you know a doctor from a cowboy and that's where your getting your information all scrambled. When you know who's who we can talk, until then your arguments are not worth my time.

Originally Posted by clgustaveson

Like I said apparently you have no clue... I don't want to deal with this argument from square one.

Go through medical school and pharmacology, learn the history and then try to compare them. I don't think you know a doctor from a cowboy and that's where your getting your information all scrambled. When you know who's who we can talk, until then your arguments are not worth my time.

I am not the one arguing and I believe what the Bible says about it. It is clear, concise, and straight to the point. If you want to argue about it, then argue with God and rant with Him about it.

[clgustaveson]

Originally Posted by Oneness Man

I am not the one arguing and I believe what the Bible says about it. It is clear, concise, and straight to the point. If you want to argue about it, then argue with God and rant with Him about it.

Apparently you don't get my point.

Doctors practice medicine in a parallel manor to the pharmacological process. You are separating the two like they have no connection.

Not only is your interpretation of the scripture inaccurately but you don't know Peter from Paul.

You are arguing that we are off topic but you apparently don't know what either does.

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Oneness Man

You are ridiculous to think that the scripture was talking about doctors, it was not. The scripture was talking about pharmacists, which is why you are so adamant against the truth of that scripture.

You called God, the "Great Witch", not me.

You haven't proven your case against what the scripture says and you don't even know how to do it in an intelligent manner, which is pathetic.

my friend, the scripture was talking about witchcraft....the greek word Pharmika (sp).

it was not talking about Pharmicists.

Originally Posted by Ferd

my friend, the scripture was talking about witchcraft....the greek word Pharmika (sp).

it was not talking about Pharmicists.

Okay, so let me show you what it says.

Gal 5:20 Idolatry,1495 witchcraft,5331 hatred,2189 variance,2054 emulations,2205 wrath,2372 strife,2052 seditions,1370 heresies,139

G5331
φαρμακεία
pharmakeia
far-mak-i'-ah
From G5332; medication (“pharmacy”), that is, (by extension) magic (literal or figurative): - sorcery, witchcraft.


G5332
φαρμακεύς
pharmakeus
far-mak-yoos'
From φάρμακον pharmakon (a drug, that is, spell giving potion); a druggist (“pharmacist”) or poisoner, that is, (by extension) a magician: - sorcerer.


This is straight and to the point. It says what says. Don't blame me because it says it.

[clgustaveson]

Originally Posted by Oneness Man

Okay, so let me show you what it says.

Gal 5:20 Idolatry,1495 witchcraft,5331 hatred,2189 variance,2054 emulations,2205 wrath,2372 strife,2052 seditions,1370 heresies,139

G5331
φαρμακεία
pharmakeia
far-mak-i'-ah
From G5332; medication (“pharmacy”), that is, (by extension) magic (literal or figurative): - sorcery, witchcraft.


G5332
φαρμακεύς
pharmakeus
far-mak-yoos'
From φάρμακον pharmakon (a drug, that is, spell giving potion); a druggist (“pharmacist”) or poisoner, that is, (by extension) a magician: - sorcerer.


This is straight and to the point. It says what says. Don't blame me because it says it.

Back to square one I see....