AFF apostolic or not?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

He didn't ask why can't a man wear a skirt. He asked why can't a man wear a pair of PANTS that are as long as a womans dress.

Narrow is slowly coming around to realizing the mess his position has gotten him in. Maybe he'll be a little more kind with his insults before we're done.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Whole Hearted

Aff is not apostolic

Then neither are you since you are here

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by pelathais

Narrow is slowly coming around to realizing the mess his position has gotten him in. Maybe he'll be a little more kind with his insults before we're done.

yeah i saw his lame attempt to weasel out of that mess

[Narrow Is The Way]

Originally Posted by pelathais

Thanks - but still you were the one who popped in with the first crabby post in our exchange and it didn't say anything about prax. You just started off by insinuating that I was "stupid" because we disagree.

You have clarified that post with another insinution that I am "stupid;" but this time you add that it was Prax who causes to behave in such an anti-social fashion.

But still - your point: Are you saying that the "hem length" is "that which pertaineth to a woman?" That men at all times must cover their ugly hairy calf while women are free to catch a breeze upon their more attractive and curvaceous limbs?

And do you assert that this idea comes from the Bible itself? God's inspired Word? Or do you just prefer to look at the attractive and curvaceous as opposed to the ugly and hairy?

I would prefer that a womans skirt length is mid calf or below. I am glad that you have a strong conviction on skirt length. I really appreciate that. You think that a woman's dress should go as low as a mans pair of pants and quite frankly I think that is great. I really appreciate good standards. Prax made the argument about length. I was responding to the argument. You make a great argument regarding a womans skirt length. I think it should certainly be closer to the floor than the knees. I like good strong standards.

[dizzyde]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Who appointed you AFF spokesperson?

They need to be fired.

Why don't you actively engage in some sort of ministry, and then come back and lecture the Elder.

Until then, I'd say the best thing you could do is log off for more than two hours a day.

Or is that too much to ask?

*clears throat*

If I may interject, I think he was actually complimenting Bro. Epley, not lecturing him...

backing out cautiously....

[Narrow Is The Way]

Originally Posted by pelathais

Narrow is slowly coming around to realizing the mess his position has gotten him in. Maybe he'll be a little more kind with his insults before we're done.

I forgot. Only libs can be offensive and it be ok. Sorry.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Narrow Is The Way

. Prax made the argument about length. I was responding to the argument. You make a great argument regarding a womans skirt length. I think it should certainly be closer to the floor than the knees. I like good strong standards.

Oh baloney. You didn't reply to me but him. Then you argued that which pertaineth to a woman which was never about length. Just be honest and admit you made a mess rather than trying to divert attention with the ad hominems and red herrings (and the insults)

[StillStanding]

Originally Posted by Narrow Is The Way

I forgot. Only libs can be offensive and it be ok. Sorry.

You're wrong! We are an equal opportunity forum!

[hometown guy]

Originally Posted by Narrow Is The Way

I forgot. Only libs can be offensive and it be ok. Sorry.

yeah, if you do it you have a bad spirit and if they do it ,well, you still have a bad spirit.

[Narrow Is The Way]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Oh baloney. You didn't reply to me but him. Then you argued that which pertaineth to a woman which was never about length. Just be honest and admit you made a mess rather than trying to divert attention with the ad hominems and red herrings (and the insults)

I quoted you post prax. I put in bold the statement of yours I was referring too. You got yourself in a little deeper than what you thought and now you are attempting to make it look like I dug myself a hole. Not true, in fact it it the opposite. You are the one that is trying to dig out of this mess. Nice try.